Yglesias is pretty much a Master of None.

It really is amazing to watch the King of the Wonks get taken for a ride repeatedly by people as stupid as Paul Ryan.

Or that liberal bastion the New York Times treats complete monsters and morons like Ben Shapiro or David Brooks like they’re utterly normal.

Yes. Wikipedia. That bastion of neutrality and unimpeachable resistance to manipulation...

There’s also no way Silicon Valley tech geeks’s performative progressivism is gonna outstrip their overall greed.

Ehhhh. Damian’s long past his initial son of Satan phase. He’s more a victim of poor-writing these days. I do miss when he and Dick were partners.

That’s more Jason’s deal IMHO. Dick’s more down-to-earth sure. But he was also raised by a rich dude for most of his childhood.

Yeah man. Why would anyone be convinced that a guy in his mid-90's who recently lost his wife could be in a state where he’s being taken advantage of?

A goodly chunk of the posts I see on ex-Gawker sites are people bitching about how the site isn’t what it used to be, or how they’d wish someone would put it down, or how mean a sister site (Jezebel or the Root is). Why not just leave if you’re that unhappy?

If racism were a problem for Reddit, we wouldn’t have r/thedonald.

Heh, nice of you to quote my favorite arc from that title. And yeah, I’m hoping King allows Bruce to step back a bit. Especially since a lot of the point of his run is that Bruce is an unhappy man trying really hard to actually enjoy what he does have.

I’ve always liked the Morrison take where because he’s been a superhero since he was a kid, he’s more self-assured. That’s why he’s a better leader and friend in that regard.

If we did, there wouldn’t be an alt-right.

If he somehow manages to do that and put Amazon in check, he’ll have unwittingly done good two separate times in his life.

A puppet?

You’re the one who called Google’s critics “whining yuppies”, let’s not try to pretend you’re so above the fray.

Do you always go for the most obtuse angle in an argument, or is that just an unconscious thing? Nobody is denying that military funding creates consumer technology. But there has to be a limit to how much rope we’re willing to give in that regard, especially in the creation of a surveillance state. If you can’t grasp…

Makes you wonder if they’ve actually watched the movie considering it promotes feminism and is anti-interventionist.

Bully for you. Some of us actually want to consider the logical consequences behind what an expanded surveillance state can do to us and not just service your greed.

What in the fuck are you even talking about? Mental health expenditures were cut under Reagan’s watch. People on the left have been clamoring NOT to use mental illness as a scapegoat for shootings since they’re not a deciding factor, and moreover we don’t even bother to invest money into helping drive awareness or…