“Slowly we are devolving into a bunch of moralless spineless pussies that get offended by everything and want you to conform to the their opinion no matter what yours is in other words nazism”

It’s telling that you compare a black object to a black person.

No one has ever asked for your opinion either, yet here we are.

If it had been focus-grouped, I think we can all agree there’d be a whole lot more alien titty.

Their cousin Aaron thinks they’re a couple of bitches.

Soon-Yi was never his daughter. She was adopted by Mia Farrow, separately from Woody. Not saying it’s not weird, but his daughter she isn’t.

What even is your point anymore? The new Star Wars movies do include their descendants in the story and it absolutely is a continuation of the previous story. The main antagonist is a descendant, so... what? Every character has to be a descendant for it to be considered a continuation of the previous story?

Again, there’s a series of movies in the Potter-verse that is not about Hogwarts or Potter. Your example is a bad one.

There is a new series in the Harry Potter universe that does not focus on Harry Potter, his family, or his friends. Some tangential characters, sure, but not the main family.

Snoke opened the connection between Kylo and Rey.

An interesting theory, but who sees a random disembodied hand and says, “I should clone a person out of that”?

Your analogy doesn’t work, because the Great Orange Ding Dong personally held every plane up in the sky in 2017 with his massive hands, saving us all from certain death.

And there you go again, still claiming that your opinion is a fact that everyone shares. Fuck off.

Except the majority of professional critics who analyze all of those qualities have said that the movie is good based on THOSE EXACT QUALITIES, so by your definition, the movie is objectively good, not bad.

No, it isn’t.

I am finally making a concerted effort to play all of Majora’s Mask. I never played it on N64. I’ve had it for my 3DS for a while now and I’ve started it at least three times, usually making it through the first temple. Then I’ve taken a break and forgotten what I was doing and I’ve just gotten intimidated by the time…

Not at all. I simply was stating a fact. You made a claim that the movie is objectively bad. That is a demonstrably false statement, as any quality measurement of the film is subjective in nature. By claiming that it is objectively bad, you are a showing that you are a stubborn liar who believes his opinions are…

Two different writers with different opinions writing conflicting articles on the same site is a far cry from a dumbass trying to prove the fakeness of a news organization using their own news articles as examples of non-fake news.