gawkerisgone7
Gawkerisgone
gawkerisgone7

Since Lifehacker isthe ultimate authority on optimizing every aspect of your life”, and in no way a site driving a specific political agenda, could you now run an article showing how readers can HELP government agencies who are working to enforce the laws of this nation, and bring justice to those who have willfully

An illegal Immigrant killed my nephew, why would I want to help these people who are breaking our laws and violating our own citizens rights?  What good is anyone doing by helping people who are breaking our laws avoid capture or delay deportation?  How absolutely disgusting that people who have zero clue about the

If an individual is arrested, they should understand they retain the right to remain silent and should express that out loud. They should also ask for a lawyer immediately.

You forgot to put the word “ILLEGAL” Before immigrants.

Having worked for tips for YEARS, it is not overstated at all. Is it illegal? Yes, but as our president has stated loosely, you are very smart if you can avoid paying income tax.

Couple things I literally laughed at:
“reproductive healthcare has a lot to do with life”
“you’re not inconvenienced by material”

Thank you so much for this great life-hack. 12 years ago or so I’d come to lifehacker for tips on GTD (and that whole cult), new software and tools, psychological hacks for better productivity, etc.

These sales are usually joked about heavily on FlyerTalk and Slickdeals. I’m pretty sure Southwest just does these as advertising for their brand in general, because they’re rarely any cheaper than the normal everyday fares. And they’ve done it for as long as I can remember, so 15+ years.

I was never really too concerned with the waste aspect of something that breaks down naturally, but always heard that the bleaching process (due to our obsession with white towels, white paper, etc) was the more pressing environmental issue here. I know it’s apples and oranges, but if I could buy a brown version of

Methinks you don’t know what the word “fact” means.

Absolutely! I am 100% in favor of gay rights, period. But as long as Chik-fil-A is willing to serve and treat their gay customers and employees just as they would anyone else, I am also in favor of their owners right to “support traditional marriage”. We don’t have to paint everyone that doesn’t support something with

No, it’s not. Hating some and not supporting the alteration of an institution like marraige (government borrowed it from a specific faith) are not similar.

Please provide one example of how they are “homophobic”. There’s a pretty big difference between supporting traditional marriage due to your religious convictions and being a homophobe or a bigot.

“...to finance up to three months of rent over a 12 month period.”

Once you stick your hand in that wood chipper, it's hard as hell to get it out. Unfortunately, more and more people who don't have the support system are forced into it every day...

Isn’t potholing only an issue on roads that are exposed to the elements and temperature changes? Underground tunnels would be relatively controlled environments.

I do support those causes. But murder is murder. You don’t stop fighting simply because crime happens somewhere else too. For sake of reference, in 2017 there were just under 40,000 gun deaths in the US and about 60% were self-inflicted. During the same time frame, there were over 800,000 deaths from abortion. So

Why would you want to boycott companies who are standing up for vulnerable children? The hatefulness of doing that is unimaginable in the 21st century. That is the stuff of ancient and unscientific eras. These companies should be supported, not boycotted.

When I plug something into my (Android) phone, I have to give explicit permission through a notification before it’s allowed to do *anything* (see or transfer data, tether, etc.) other than charge the battery. If I don’t acknowledge the notification, it just charges. Is that not the case on all phones?

You are making a lot of assumptions there. What evidence do you have that programmers are paid more now because of some latent sexism and not the fact that we are now in a digital age and there is a big need for programmers?