Shatner could take a shit on a puppy, subsequently rescued by Patrick Stewart who finds the puppy a loving home, and TOS would still be superior.

Well, I'd say if he hates "sjw's" but loves regular women, minorities, and gay people, then he's doing fine.

You've just revealed yourself to be all flash, no substance. In record time, going for the grammar/spelling/punctuation slam. Wow.

JMP is probably a decent person in their day to day life, but The despicable garbage that masquerades as an "informed, enlightened opinion" around these parts is baffling, since it seems that they hate more people than the racists and misogynists do.

so you must be one, but without the oxy part.

You on the other hand, shouldn't be allowed near a computer.

But you see they don't agree with that definition, and they believe that the definition itself is racist and misogynistic, probably.

We're not talking about people who are racist. We're talking about the use of the term SJW. The fact that you jump immediately to racism and misogyny just shows how one tracked your mind is.

Sure, why not. Oh yeah, because you don't agree. So you're right about everything, always.

You are making shit up again. Where the fuck are your conclusions and information coming from? What is your aim, to just spit bile at people and feel superior?

No, but claiming anyone who disagrees with you is a bigot certainly is. It's a chicken or the egg situation, but that's what it is. Worst part about the left is when they think they're infallible and every shit they take is a work of art.

You're lying. Why isn't there a flagging option for bullshit like this?

What? Okay, i can play that game too

So I googled Bigotry and this came up:

You sound like a reasonable person with a nuanced opinion.

So basically, the whole "sexuality politics" thing has turned into a fucked up pretzel.

What the FUCK are you talking about? You say "If you're only attracted to a certain type of genitals" like that's the STRANGEST thing in the world? What's wrong with you? Are gay men bigots because they don't like vagina?

So you're attracted to everybody, huh?

It does go both ways. I hate how the term snowflake is used to describe ANYONE with a grievance, when in my day it was for the people who had to be catered to in EVERY way, It didn't have to be political. It was for people who think they're special and don't have to do things the way that everybody else has to. Mostly…

It's all about context. Nothing wrong with Social Justice. You add "warrior' to the end of it and use it in the context of people talking on the internet, that's when it seems a bit silly. No one would object to the term as a positive thing if we were talking about a March on Washington, then the warrior part doesn't…