I can see where he's coming from. I can imagine myself being in a situation where I'm in love with someone but the feeling isn't mutual, yet I'm good enough for sex with them. I would feel hurt and in a moment of vulnerability I would mention that on live tv. Should have been kept private, but I understand. You…

So...she knows the guy is in love with her... so she humps and dumps?

"First of all, I think that's kind of below the belt. That's something that should be private," she said, before explaining that she felt what they had was real.

You should not fuck people who are in love with you when you are clearly not. That's called leading them on and using them. You can go fuck someone else, but you shouldn't hurt someone who is very much into you.

I watched the whole season and 100% agree. It's not about her sexual autonomy. What she did was not nice.

So you think they should say fucking on ABC? Awesome, are you 12?

Sometimes I fucking hate the over-the-top feminism on display at Jezebel. I can't understand the idea of "slut-shaming" in regards to this story. I do not watch the show but can appreciate the detailed recap of this relationship. Why, because this man is hurting and therefore speaking out of that hurt and anger,…

Making love happens. I'd never fucking call it that, but the concept (without the BS emotional baggage from countless parents and administrators trying to curtail teen sex) is apt, sometimes.

What a person showing too much emotions and and clearly not being in control of them seems like something a sociopaths does?

He was on national TV, was he supposed to say fucking?

Seriously. The guy is sad enough. Let's not add insult to injury.

Whatever, when previous Bachelors sleep with both finalists knowing full well already who they are picking, they are called assholes by everybody, but because this is a guy he was ~Slut Shaming her. Good, she deserved to be put on blast because she avoided talking to him twice and he WAS lead on completely. She…

I have to disagree with this. I have no objections to women having casual, no-strings-attached sex. That's totally fine. But only when BOTH parties know that's what it is. I didn't watch the show, but it seems to me that this guy had very real, deep feelings for Andi, and it's clear from his quotes that this wasn't…

Why is that?

All for not slut-shaming, but can we go a little easier on Nick? I feel bad for him. He really loved her and thought he was sealing the deal. It is completely valid for him to feel hurt by her taking things as far as she did. I think she knew for a while that she was picking Josh. Sleeping with Nick wasn't fair to him…

I've never watched an episode of this show, but where can I get me a man like that? If he didn't want to be having sex until both parties were in love, that is such a rare quality in men, my jaw actually dropped to hear him say that.

Awww, he seems so sad - I feel bad for him. Totally did not watch but he could rest his pretty little head on my shoulder no problem.

Cry all you want Nick. Andi won this round.

So he loved her. She knew it. She didn't love him. She fucked him anyways. Anyone who criticizes her for doing this is "slut-shaming". O for fuck's sake.

I don't think he was trying to slut shame her. I think he was asking why she would do that, knowing how he felt about her, because it would give him hope, or he felt lead on by that. He was clearly vulnerable to her and cared about her a lot. If the roles were reversed I know I wouldn't want to feel like a notch on…