gamercents
GamerCents
gamercents

This way to vague and confusing!

*muah*

I know, right? If you're solid in your faith then this stuff doesn't really affect you.

In short, depends on you.

How have I not seen this until now??

Yeah... It's pretty obvious that this place is designed to be a Holier than America 'Murica.

Jesus Christ!!

Did anyone else see this and think "Up.... UP.... AND AWAAAAAAAAYY!!!!"

I gather that Savjosh was more less retorting that rather than point out both responses to her initial announcement of 'Tropes V Women in Video Games' she only pointed out the backlash, using it to fuel the fire of her cause. That's okay, in one aspect. She has a very clear demonstration of the "boys club" mentality

It was more of a "hey, I'd rather have a physical product in my hand that I can touch and be reassured will work without a second source than an online 'license' that permits me to play a game for the same price" kind of thing.

That's like saying "Reading books isn't research." The games are the content. You can't just simply watch them and understand. You have to actually play them, experience them, in order to fully grasp the concepts behind them.

I agree that she probably didn't think that talking about the female tropes in video games would garner such massive backlash and overnight fame (or infamy in the eyes of some). However, she recently spoke at a TED conference for women where she talked specifically about the hate and threats she was getting as a

Sadly, that comes with the territory of doing something that is very controversial. It's also where she could use some of that 160K she raised to hire forum managers to filter out the hate speech.

I know she had to do a massive amount of research - aka play a lot of these games that she's talking about - and that's not terribly cheap. Then again, neither is it going to cost $160K.

To put it simpler: There's nothing more reassuring than a physical product in your hands.

Can someone please explain the sense in the overarching story?

"You vote with your dollars."

This was the best way anyone could have responded to this entire article.

I work in an industry where people are doing presentations all the time. I see small-time meetings and then I see big-ass productions, the presenters/MCs are people that A) are good with an audience, B) know something about the event and have a personal investment in it and C) know how to use a damned microphone and

Remember when Aisha Tyler was the lead presenter for Ubisoft at E3?