Because multiplayer ASSUMES numerous controllers!!

Do you not remember that this system is over half a decade old? I still run my original, that I bought used 4 years ago. So, it's my fault I can't enjoy a game designed for this system because I didn't have the pop-culture mindset to buy a TV I didn't need just to play one $15 game on local co-op?

Really? That's your analogy?

Anyone who's saying "Get a new HDTV," "Why are you so cheap?" "Get with the times," is missing the point of the situation. The situation is this: there is a very popular feature of Minecraft for XBOX 360 for which many wanted the game. It was local co-op. It is listed in the game information and that is all.

So, it's the customers' fault that this problem happened because they weren't "keeping up with the times"?

The "required hardware" should ONLY be the video game system to run it.

Seriously!

The difference between a $60 game and a $300 TV is $240 - Math is Delicious - and that $240 can go to rent, food, car payments. The game that I want to play doesn't need to be in HD, so I can play it on SDTV... unless it's Minecraft's local multiplayer. Oops!

Maybe so, but it wouldn't be seen as dishonest marketing.

Really?

The New "Self-Defeating" Paul Christoforo V2. This version adds more ass-backwards thinking and legal issues to the mix which are all self-defeated by his own tweets. Yours today for the price of internet access.

When he loses this suit (because let's face it, he will), he may actually have the balls to say that the judge was ruling unfairly and may try to push to a higher court.

Hipster.