gallaghertw
TomG
gallaghertw

I hate when people talk about generations, period. The Baby Boomers were a thing because demographically it had a clear launch-off and abatement linked to historical events.

Hillary can get salty as fuck. She tries to suppress it, but this would be the one match-up she could really let it rip.

He’s sort of a caudillo. His main appeal is sticking it to people in power, shaking things up, that sort of thing.

I don’t know about you, Susan Sarandon, but gunning for a revolution might not be smart.

1.) We spend close 12 billion on border control already, and a little more than that on drugs. Doesn’t do a damned thing, except make it more profitable to traffic people and drugs. If you restrict supply without addressing demand, you just increase price and producer surplus, encouraging more of that activity. Pretty

It wouldn’t be a crime even if she tripped the other runner, it would be a civil thing. If you slip and fall and there wasn’t a wet-floor sign, you go to court, or you stop bitching. Same logic applies in sports.

I dispute that, but to each his own.

Sander would take us back to the same tax rates we had in the 60's. Universal healthcare works great in Britain. The Banks are too big, and a lack of competition in the financial sector in general is stifling growth.

Star Trek Enterprise drove the series into the ground. I don’t mind Archer, but his role was overshadowed by the sheer awfulness of the show he was main character in.

Well, it does kind of make sense to a degree. Amphibious assault ships are primarily used as helicopter carriers, despite their name. Roll-on Roll off ships do most of the heavy lifting in Amphibious operations, and could take on most of the role.

Admittedly, they gave the Medal of Honor out like candy until WWI.

You clearly haven’t watched History Channel pre-2010. Or read a book.

This is a terrible event, but I wish people would take these events in perspective. Europe has been through this before. The Troubles, the Red Army Faction, and the ETA weren’t any less deadly than Islamic terrorism. The Islamic State is morally and ideologically bankrupt, and Europe will outlast them.

whoops, didn’t read carefully

Don’t forget the Swiss!

That perspective makes little sense, and that commentary is a shortened (but extremely similar) version of an equally flawed commentary by Joseph Kennedy in Politico.

I could really only see a nuclear ship as having the potential for a major disaster, and a lot of people think its a nuke like the Kirov, may bad. The ship is structurally sound, after all. Just the innards are rotten.

They aren’t cowards. Individually, they are about as brave as American soldiers. The difference is the organizations they are in.

5k? Even if you mean meters instead of feet, that’s easy for a MANPAD, especially if you don’t have installed missile detection systems.

I wouldn’t say that. He won’t be able to advance, but the US and the Arabs likely won’t provide additional aid, in fear of provoking the Russians. Plus, the ethnic cleansing of parts of Syria means there isn’t many people left in Syrian Govt. territory rebelling.