gabriellacreighton
Seraphna
gabriellacreighton

The same exact people behind the last two are behind the next two. Feige is fighting over a credit on films he’s never actually been involved in.

Negotiations are actually still happening. This was just an offer rejection.

Actually the reverse happened. Disney went back to an older agreement Sony never accepted in the past after their last deal expired, Disney is the one demanding more money in this situation.

Exact opposite. They want to keep making money. The original reason Sony refused to include Spider-Man in the MCU was a deal which Disney took 50% of all the profits despite also keeping the merch profits, leaving Sony to actually produce the film. In other words, Sony actually got little to nothing out of the deal.

I feel like you made this exact comment about She-Ra.

Whatever you say sweetie.

I mean... basic replayability right there....?

Nope. No matter how much you’re going to pretend I said something one way, I didn’t, and I’m done talking to you. Dictate a conversation to someone else. The only issue I see here is someone who’s so hell bent on being right he’s convinced he can tell someone they did or said something they did not.

Work she didn’t do.

Let’s work on some English here.

And... that isn’t being argued at all my dude. I’m asking why news sources aren’t crediting her for the right thing in an ironic way while complaining that she’s been removed.

Citing some evidence so we don’t go down the “How do we know who you are, you could be anyone” rabbit hole.

1) Then probably not the best idea to argue that other people might not know, since you have no clue who I am.

I’m asking why she should get credited for things she didn’t do on top of what she actually did do. That’s all. And articles all over right now are crediting her for a lot of stuff that the evidence just doesn’t hold up on. :/

That sir, is a good point. At the same time, it just seems weird that they don’t appear to do any research and just toss titles at her. :/

<.<

Hatsuu listed her own credits as having done the work with the ESRB for the PC and PS3 versions of the game. (This is the pinned post on her Twitter account. Seems relevant.) That’s what it has to do with anything.

I’d agree, but only with specified labels. I don’t think you should credit people for work they did not do.

Can you point out where in the post you replied to that I disagreed with your statement?

I mean... I’m agreeing with that? My issue is mostly with news sites accrediting her to positions she never held.