1) Then probably not the best idea to argue that other people might not know, since you have no clue who I am.
1) Then probably not the best idea to argue that other people might not know, since you have no clue who I am.
I’m asking why she should get credited for things she didn’t do on top of what she actually did do. That’s all. And articles all over right now are crediting her for a lot of stuff that the evidence just doesn’t hold up on. :/
That sir, is a good point. At the same time, it just seems weird that they don’t appear to do any research and just toss titles at her. :/
<.<
Hatsuu listed her own credits as having done the work with the ESRB for the PC and PS3 versions of the game. (This is the pinned post on her Twitter account. Seems relevant.) That’s what it has to do with anything.
I’d agree, but only with specified labels. I don’t think you should credit people for work they did not do.
Can you point out where in the post you replied to that I disagreed with your statement?
I mean... I’m agreeing with that? My issue is mostly with news sites accrediting her to positions she never held.
Here’s my question, what makes you think you know what’s going on at all?
Did she work on the port? No? Then there’s the problem of figuring out who should get credit.
Full Stop. I agreed she should be credited for voice direction, that’s the work she did that got carried over. I’m not exactly sure how or why she should be credited for all the other aspects that someone else worked on…
Turn of phrase. If she wasn’t working with the company when the PS4 version came out, then of course she didn’t do those things. So someone else had to.
That was kind of a reach dude.
See, that makes more sense. The thing is, XSEED’s format tends to credit each person for a single task involved, their big thing is to not elevate any single person above anyone else in the credits.
The issue here is that they had a policy to stop crediting people after they leave equally, apparently, probably to not…
Yeah, kinda my point. Even the titles of all these articles are misleading.
First... she didn’t work on the edited English text. I think you’re confusing her with Jessica Chavez. She was the translation editor.
Hatsuu was the voice director and a production coordinator (someone who handles logistics for the project).
So... if I were to set up the ESRB Ratings for a game, and it’s ported in a few years to a new platform and someone else does that work... I should get the credit for it despite not being around anymore?
Since it seems like overnight the poor girl has been miscredited for the game even by those covering what she did for it:
My main problem with this article and the comments is that there’s the repeated claim that XSEED removes employees from the credits after they leave the company. This is vague beyond words. The person in question is still in the credits of dozens of games XSEED worked on, so maybe a bit of clarity is needed? This was…
You make some vague statements here, XSEED has never removed someone from the credits on a game they worked on while working with the company. They don’t go back and edit those credits. Her name and Tom’s can still be found on dozens of their releases.
Except her credits for the PS3 / PC versions included QA, Marketing, ESRB Handling, and a bunch of other things someone else likely did for the PS4 version. Who’s supposed to get those credits exactly? Does the new person not deserve the credit for their work because someone else worked on a previous version?
Based on the reviews I’m seeing, old people don’t get the franchise and assume a video game movie is automatically bad. Making it plain once again how useless traditional movie reviews are now. Any review coming from a gaming site, geek movie reviewers, etc, are all glowing and positive.