If by less you mean Red is no longer the majority there, yes.

> Implying that Atlanta is part of Conservative GA in anything other than relation to locale.

Being gay isn’t debatable and it isn’t a choice. Nor should our having to be “tolerated” by bigots. They need to get over themselves. I do not believe in cowering and hoping the decide in their supposed superiority to let me exist.

What I’m saying is you’re full of it and attempting to preach silencing people about something you’d rather ignore.

And what I’m saying is the more you preach that people should go silent about it, the more I’m convinced you’re one of those people who prefers people “don’t ask don’t tell” and push for the silencing of issues that make you uncomforterable.

My family is rooted in Atlanta, so I’d hate to be the one to do this but your point is a no brainer. Atlanta was considered a center of progressive culture before Seattle was. You’re kind of using one of the few places where this hasn’t been a problem for a long time as a symbol of what it’s like in the rest of the…

Translation: “As soon as you all stop bringing it to my attention the sooner I can ignore it easier and therefore tolerate things I don’t like.”

Dude, pick a lane. First you say that it should be normalized, now you’re using the marginalization to claim that it shouldn’t be treated equally.

The point and the problem is that things AREN’T normal still. If this kind of reaction, both positive and negative, still exists. We can’t get over this because it still isn’t normal. You can say it should be all you want, and I totally agree, but it isn’t, and that’s the issue.

Then than, yes. More than is the question at hand though.

Making things normal would mean making LGBTQ relations just as prevelant and common as straight relationships. If the reaction to one featured romance is this strongly opposed, we have a looong way to go.

I think you’re giving too much credit to a vocal minority just because their theory turned out to be correct.

You lessen the impact of your own point by trying to lecture people if they got offended over your words.

We should hope they are touting LGBTQ relationships intentionally. They’ve been intentionally not doing it for a looooong time. It’s a welcome change.

Probably the whole point, but I do wonder if this whole thing with these responses every time there’s anything inclusive is some kind of cry for attention and exposition, lacking the common sense to realize heteronormative people get that attention and exposition all the time.

I have this weird disconnected feeling where I’m asking myself how no one sees this as the usual practice of making characters look more like an actor they probably modeled them off of.

If I had to guess? They did this presentation simply to say they did something so their investors would be happy. SE will spout hypeworks off at TGS as usual.

This is where you’re so desperate to be right you’ve already abandoned your own argument and all logic. You’ve already made it expressly vital that people be able to communicate by voice in multiplayer games with ease. Now you’re trying to argue my point with a solution that would not make it easy at all to…

And that means all matchmaking and ability to play with others is closed for all.

Your friend code thing absolutely makes no sense, friend codes and friends lists don’t prevent people from chatting to each other in games. On top of that, my point was that parents might not even want their kids to USE voice chat, so how is anything you said about buying them a phone or a computer a point? It would…