How is this coverage in any way necessary?

The ACA required coverage for unnecessary and risky things. This caused insurers to charge more. The marketplace subsidies baked into the ACA put downward pressure on premiums, and to balance that deductibles had to rise. A lot.

You’re the exception. Premiums have risen, so Americans are actually spending more of your money on premiums than pre-ACA.

Afford to have it, sure. But can you afford to use it?

The Braves didn’t own many of those lots. It’s a non-controversial opinion that the owners of those lots passed a ton of money into the Atlanta political machine in order to secure their continued windfall at the expense of the Summerhill neighborhood.

He lost the first race, and now this one.

Entropy?

Work on your reading comprehension, then get back to me.

I’m not arguing they should have overturned Pittsburgh’s goal. I’m saying that’s the only “tit for tat” one could come up with. You can’t say 5 power plays is equal to a goal.

Nah. “Everything in their power” would have been disallowing that goal on the wimpy interference. 1 bad call preventing a goal for each team makes it equal.

Ummm, that’s how a catcher calls for a regular old boring inside fastball.

Gonna pick some nits. The first two games were in Toronto. Yesterday and today’s games are the only two in metro Atlanta.

She quit.

Well, everyone can vote now and senators are now elected by the people. Their system (as presented above) is no longer around. So I guess they failed, but if we’re only going off the points in the above post they’re not really to blame for it.

I don’t have time to write a book so “people don’t like Trump” is what I went with.

I don’t like Trump. I don’t want him to be the president (I’d rather the office be so inconsequential that it doesn’t matter who the president is, FWIW). But I don’t want to see what happens when 0.000169% of the US population decides against a fair election result.

Go for it. I’m not arguing against petitioning electors and begging them to vote for someone else.

The Electoral College going against the result of a free and fair election would be akin to Roger Goodell deciding there was a new winner of the SuperBowl. He can definitely do this, but no matter the reason Goodell uses for replacing the rules-based winner (the losing team had more yards, or even a team that didn’t…

No. Because Trump won based upon the rules of the game (most points wins). But since people don’t like Trump, they’re willing to disregard the rules and give the W to the team with the most yards.

He won the election based on the rules of the election. If it were decided by popular vote, then each participant’s strategy would be different.