Go for it. I’m not arguing against petitioning electors and begging them to vote for someone else.
G0Barves
g0barves
The Electoral College going against the result of a free and fair election would be akin to Roger Goodell deciding there was a new winner of the SuperBowl. He can definitely do this, but no matter the reason Goodell uses for replacing the rules-based winner (the losing team had more yards, or even a team that didn’t…
No. Because Trump won based upon the rules of the game (most points wins). But since people don’t like Trump, they’re willing to disregard the rules and give the W to the team with the most yards.
He won the election based on the rules of the election. If it were decided by popular vote, then each participant’s strategy would be different.
Government run bus systems are sometimes too lenient as well. This isn’t a private/public issue. There are a great number of both publicly and privately managed school bus systems and the fact that this just doesn’t happen should make it clear to anyone that the issue isn’t public/private or govt./free market.
So, politicians? I don’t support Trump or believe he is the answer to their ills, but these people have voted blue and red through the years and things haven’t gotten better. “Politicians” is the common thread with the victors and Trump railed against them.
It’s to prevent vote selling and intimidation. This is the proof that you voted one way or another.
A federal judge doesn’t even agree with them seeing as he just allowed for a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of these “selfie laws”. http://kdvr.com/2016/11/04/judges-order-prohibits-enforcement-of-law-that-bans-ballot-selfies/
Oregon is 83% white. It’s not shocking.
Just because you work in the same building as some of the smartest (most valuable) people in the nation doesn’t mean you are of the same value.
Depends. Mostly on what you want to do with the water.
Depends. Mostly on what you want to do with the water.
Ah yes. Those stupid millennials not knowing what’s best for them. Let’s just keep talking down to them until they listen!
If a union provides a service worth the cost, people will join.
lol, good one.
The Senate’s consent is absent, therefore no appointment.
All it takes is the leadership to never bring up the nomination for a hearing. Part of the optics of all this includes not putting a vulnerable senator’s name on this decision.
This door has always been open.
Sure? But he’d lose, because it’s explicit that the Senate has to give their consent.
We’ve stopped caring about Hillary’s flip-flopping (and never cared about Trump’s) so why should it apply to McCain?