“all of whom spoke anonymously because they did not want to risk damaging their careers.”

Crimson Skies

I wouldn’t be suspicious... Unless this post originally appeared on Kotaku.

Can you give me some examples of people “tying their worth to their purchasing power”?

The reason for commenting publicly is it’s just good business sense, especially if they’re running like a typically Triple A studio (long hours, no proper compensation for overtime, poor attitude towards those who are sick / have family) and deserving of the Glass Door reviews.

Staff would have been passing the reviews…

This is a great article and important too.

Just a little feedback:

PLEASE stick to using the same name for the same person throughout an article. You’ve used the name Thomas, Oliver and Tom to refer to the same person in this piece. If you’re quoting someone who uses one name when you’ve used another, use parenthesis…

Kids don’t understand what the word “journalism” means any more.

I would suggest donating them.

Sounds more like Church of Capitalist America to me.

Fantastic idea Ben!

I don’t know how you can have Prince of Persia and Mortal Kombat but not Warcraft.

This is bad and the reason they should allow name changes.

Damn those high fidelity screens!

The key is to simply not engage with the fandom.

A friend of mine was a matte painter for Spartacus.

“Accident”... sure it was.

I don’t get why so many people are blaming the team aspect of the game for the toxicity.

Doesn’t Chapter 11 usually mean “restructuring” aka sacking all existing staff and reducing the new employees pay, whilst increasing executive pay?

This article assumes that you’ve got the money and space for cupboards, and permission to mount these on walls.

No, actually “judgement” is correct.