Leave $50 on the bedside table, loudly announce you are going to a movie and then observe the room from the outside.

Really? I use mine as a water-diviner.

If someone is in a public place where they can expect they might be observed, they don’t have a right to privacy. This means you could even film the people out in the wild and post it on whichever adult special interest site takes your fancy if you so wish.

I’d rip her bodice if you know what I .... well, of course you know what I mean, there’s no innuendo there.

I think what she said was stupid, but homophobic? If every homophobe had this attitude there would be far fewer problems.

I have literally just ordered the translation of the original Grimm’s Fairy Tales Edition 1 because if I’m going to fuck up my kids, I’m going to do it old-school.

Oh thank God. I read the headline and the twitching was uncontrollable.

You monster.

In what way? Beyond offending pearl-clutchers, what Jewish stereotypes is it presenting? Which side is it advocating for?

Making ‘edgy’ fun of the holocaust?

The thing about being offensive is... you’re allowed to be if you want to be. You don’t have to find it acceptable, but you do have to find a way to accept it.

Well.... at least they’re honest about the tenets of their religion?

Have you tied to find the original versions of the Grimm brothers’ fairy tales in a book shop? Oh granny was in the cupboard the entire time? Fuck off, granny got eaten. Oh Rumpelstiltskin just went away after being taught his lesson? Fuck off, he physically tore himself in half. The slipper didn’t fit the…

That’s because we thought we had successfully purged the lot of you. Oh well, second time lucky.

The choice between HRC and BS is one where reasonable people can disagree.

I read that it was a real razor covered in duct tape. It hadn’t cut anyone in rehearsals, but I imagine it was wearing its way through the tape all that time.

I’ll save you a seat, shall I?

I’m going to hell for instantly laughing at this.

Events just like this one? We don’t know anything about this event yet. If the shooter were routinely armed as part of their duties (perhaps as an MP) then what exactly could have been done about it? Unless you want entirely unarmed military bases (which by all means you can have some of, but there needs to be weapons…

Do we know any state policy had any effect on this? It could be the shooter was routinely armed in his (or, technically, her) duties. Unless you want to declare military bases gun-free zones (bombs and tanks still okay though) then there’s not much a Texan politician could have done.