This is some fine deductive reasoning here. I will buy it.

So here’s my theory on the identities.  It’s a little unclear if the unnamed actress has won any of the three she’s been nommed for. But if we assume she hasn’t won, and if we eliminate those who are deceased, we are left with the following possibles

Joan Allen
Diane Ladd
Angela Landsbury
Piper Laurie
Laura Linney
Michelle…

These rulings strip women of their humanity and burden men with the job of treating women like owned objects - like slaves they are expected to control. The is Christian Sharia Law in the US, and this is what Patriarchy is.

Because she, as an an actor, is responsible for the script of a movie she was in?

Lol. I’m confident that was your perception. It’s hilarious how much more this says about you than you think it does.

Ah yes, Murry Chang’s very reliable anecdotal evidence.

...do people not use the sniff test? Do people really dump their milk the second it hits the arbitrary-ass expiration date??

I don’t know how much clearer the English has to be.

Yeah, growing up with my grandma we always did that. We couldn’t afford to throw stuff away just because the date had gone out. It had to be off, and not just a little off to taste funny, but off enough to be unusable to justify tossing it.

So, according to you, and according to how you think this juror thinks, in cases of “mutual abuse” neither party is abused. No one has been abused. Got it.

oh my god THIS ALL DAY. Came down here to say this very thing. This is exactly the problem with a case like this being tried to a jury. This juror (and, I’m sure, the others) viewed their role as determining whether Heard “proved” that she was abused. But that’s not what was at issue! DEPP had to prove that the WaPo…

If I ever did, I certainly wouldn’t conflate my reaction to someone else’s expressions with “following the evidence,” as this guy did. You aren’t following the evidence if you’re trusting your gut reaction on how trustworthy someone appears.

I’ve always used the sniff test and never gotten sick from using bad milk so in my experience it works perfectly fine.

I’m just boggled by comments here implying that if someone who has been through incredible trauma doesn’t tell her story in the exact right way she doesn’t deserve to be believed.

“What I think is truthful is that they were both abusive to each other,” he says. “I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong… but to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”

It’s almost like they think they’re little humans . . .

The title and sub-title of the article suggest Roe v. Wade might not be struck down. That’s not true. The title and sub-title encourage hope when people should be appreciating that it’s do or die time.

The 1990s is when helicopter parenting started. In the 1990s, everyone was hoping for the idyllic time that was the 1950s and 1960s when “kids could be kids!” This is some seriously misplaced nostalgia.

“...the toasting process can slow things down, and a pale sandwich might mean that the kitchen was dealing with a rush. Totally fair.”

“Please, please, please fuck me because no one else will!"