Ha ha ha the oil from the Bakken shale isn’t competitive without a pipeline.

One doesn’t need a degree in petro-engineering to point out that someone made a colossally stupid comment on the interwebs.

Oil not commercially desired?

Let’s recognize that -1 Str for females - far from being “proof of inherent sexism” would be ENTIRELY justified if you’re going for realism. I’d couple that with +1 Con, usually, and be confident that’s pretty realistically justified too.

So it doesn’t actually cross their reservation: check. Thanks for confirming. Always like it when someone defends my position. THANKS!

This from someone whose last comments are:

Within 2 miles != on their property. How far does my ability to complain reach beyond my property?

Check your facts. The pipeline wasn’t crossing tribal lands at all - it was crossing a river NORTH of tribal lands.

A better school than yours, certainly.

Who said laws shouldn’t apply?

Not nearly as ridiculous as asserting with no knowledge whatsoever that the company ‘should have noticed’ 3200 bbl missing.

Really?

I completely disagree.

If I were your editor, I’d have tossed this article back to you asking “NO ACTUAL POINT MADE.” 

I thought only Trump made mistakes?

“stupid white guy saves the day,”

“...wording like that certainly makes it sound like the agency at the very least understood that they were about to produce something which would be incredibly offensive...”

“...leaders of the tech industry have been less than enthusiastic about the meeting...”

“It sounds like an evolutionary success story, but examples like this are exceptionally rare in the animal kingdom.”

It’s called denial.