I kind of wanted to hate you for saying “raison d’etre” but I also noticed that I totally agreed with something you said on the political side. I've decided I like you and there's nothing you can do about it now! Bye!
I kind of wanted to hate you for saying “raison d’etre” but I also noticed that I totally agreed with something you said on the political side. I've decided I like you and there's nothing you can do about it now! Bye!
Dear person bothering me with your reply 5 months later, there’s such a thing as balance.
Florida Kim = Ja'mie from Summer Heights High
The only time I yelled at the tv was then. "Neapolitan!"
I enjoyed this review far more than the show.
Seriously, I wish I could go back in time before I knew anything about him so I could still love Art the way I used to.
I love that perpetual sour milk expression.
Huh. Wonder what Nick Searcy thought of that. Nevermind he’s definitely cool with it.
How does Donald Glover snag a lead nomination when he's in Atlanta for like 5 minutes?
What’s up with rainbows?
I hear you, I’ve never had an overwhelming love of The Man With the Child In His Eyes, but I know that’s a fan favorite. Sometimes it just doesn’t grab you the way other songs do.
Agree, whatever turns the key for somebody!
Damn it’s hard to look at this list and not immediately think of 50 songs that I would love to add, but I’ve always found Moments of Pleasure to be an absolute dream to listen to. Her voice, the piano, the joy and pain, it's remarkable.
But hold on, you still haven't explained. What do you think of Kate’s version? And what do you think of Placebo’s version? And tell me, which one do you prefer? And when did you hear the song, and by whom?
I hear a lot people bitching about gatekeeping but I don’t see anyone actually gatekeeping. This is a non-story.
Maybe I’m just being naive, but he did open the door himself, so that makes me think he wouldn’t take that risk if there were other messages?
Or:
You said yourself that you feel they were at least psychologically abusive to each other. This is partly what the jury was supposed to rule on. She was abused, and she has a First Amendment right to shout it from the rooftops if she wants. But she didn’t; she didn’t name him. And also that means that he was not…
I think I understand. If she said it happened, she’s lying. If there are witnesses, they are lying. If there’s photographic evidence, it’s been doctored, or she’s wearing makeup to make it look like she’s been injured.
One question: Is your conclusion that they were both abusive to each other?