im disheartened to learn the average weight for woman is 165...

yes. but in technology time, products over a year old might as well be from the 1700s, especially with how fast mobile phone technology is advancing.

that website gives me a headache...

no because there are no metrics or measures of performace. there is no basis for anything they said, and they didnt include products that were made this century. (most products are +1 year old not counting the nokia lumia)

i havent read the source link yet (and i dont plant to) but from what i see, there is no mention of what qualifications or how they measured "the best performer".

You shouldn't kick me in the balls, Mrs. Kelly. My sister kicked me in the balls once...

long island?

THESE KIDS DONT HAVE PARENTS. WHY CANT YOU BE MORE SENSITIVE.

PROMOTE?

i went to the university of maryland and one of the owners of the wash post came in to speak with our biz class. ill never forget how much emotion she had and how hard she said they were working to stay relevant in the digital age.

whoa

food?

like.

isnt this what lists are for?

amen

i thought this movie was pretty meh. meh.

well said

well said. eloquent in its brevity.

this is my favorite article of all time. ive purchased every book by the author, joshua davis, and even signed up for a subscription to wired after finding this article, here on gizmodo back when it came out. thank you for posting again.

you just blew my mind