No, one instance of contradiction is enough to show that something isn't always right.

If these characters - let's just take the Flash crowd here as an example - displayed intelligence, self-knowledge, and good intentions they wouldn't subject people to the torture of months-long solitary confinement, hold prisoners without trial, or indeed any law enforcement powers, perform biological experiments on…

None of those shows carried the expectations that come from being spun off from big-budget FX extravaganzas. Buffy, Angel, Xena and Farscape could get away with their often cheap-looking FX due to charm, but I'd expect far more sophistication in terms of looks from a MCU-related show.

It would be incredibly difficult to hit the right tone with the character's combination of silly superheroics and lawyer show, and prohibitively expense for TV.

"the technology is too dangerous to let anyone get hold of it"

There was that district attorney who had the conversation about a "hypothetical" black site with Detective Other Dad. Nothing come of it, though, did it?

I dunno why, but all this talk of surrogacy has given me a hankering for pork chops. Weird, huh?

Fine with is not the same as interested in, though.

Didn't she use Mason Verger's hunt for Hannibal only as a means to find and protect Will?

Many women like it when dudes romance it up.

Did Alana ever show a lot of interest in torturing Hannibal?

Will was under Chilton's "care", while Hannibal is under Alana's. There are bound to be differences in how they are treated.

Their ultimate failure doesn't negate their actual actions and the plans they set out.

You: "But you haven't said anything about cause and effect."
Me, just two posts ago: "I'm talking about cause and effect."

You keep trying to pretend I've stated anywhere what people *should* do, even though I haven't done so. Are you maybe confusing an explanation of cause and effect for a statement about morality?

That's why, when you write about a gourmet pistolero panda, you add in another comma:
A Panda eats, shoots, and leaves.

No way man, nuance is for other people!

No, I wrote what I meant to write. I'm not talking about enjoyment or right and wrong; I'm talking about cause and effect.
And you're disregarding that someone like John Clare can't exactly go to the authorities without ending up being mistreat, possibly worse than even the slavers intended. Complying with the law,…

If you set yourself up as slaver, you really have no one else to blame when your slaves turn on you. The entire family was actively engaging in an attempt to enslave another person.

Being a "true believer" doesn't give you access to the mysteries of faith. For that, you need to be a neuroscientist.