What other reason is there for women as a group to prefer different games than men as a group?

I fervently wish there was a way to legally require organizations’ names to reflect their actual goals.

I can accept that GSA’s participation in the inauguration is not the same as endorsing Trump himself. However, it does serve to equate his election with normal, legitimate elections past. If a person doesn’t agree that his election was legitimate, it’s understandable that they would not be in favor of GSA…

I disagree that the inauguration “isn’t about him”. I understand that GSA would have participated regardless of who won but using that as justification serves to reinforce the (incorrect, in my view) idea that Trump’s election is normal. Certainly that’s not on par with actively endorsing him but normalization is not…

She continued: “It also claims the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin, which would be a capital offense, but oh my God, Il Duce likes to douse beds in floozy pee!”

I think it can be useful to look at historical examples of trends that continue today because it’s often easier to take a more detached view of events 100 years ago than those we’re in the middle of.

While this woman may be obnoxious, she does have a point. Research has found that the bells used for Swiss cows can cause deafness, affect the animals’ eating habits, and violate Swiss noise ordinances.

That translates to “do you (formal you) also have cheese, bro?”. You want something like “Käst du überhaupt, Bro?” except that “to cheese” isn’t a German verb I can find...

While I think it was a typo, I like your use of “crepey”. I too think that Trump’s scrotum would bear a resemblance to crepe paper.

Starred for pedantry.

You should have gotten a sharpie and drawn a comma after Trump. That’s a more accurate message.

Ahem. Those are tribal tats. Way to be insensitive to his culture. You can tell from the shapes that he is from the Shrieking Douche-Nozzle tribe.

Sadly even adult women are embarrassed about periods. I had a teacher in high school get all flustered when a student held a tampon in the air while asking to go to the bathroom. She was so upset about it that she thought it was worth telling me (another student) about the incident later like it was some kind of…

That’s understandable; it’s easy to seem sure on the internet. Luckily, examining one’s stance is almost always good practice.

Ah the importance of punctuation. There is a world of difference between “Donald Trump: we need a president with some balls” (as I imagine the people pictured intended) and “Donald Trump, we need a president with some balls” (which is amusing to my middle school self).

Your original question indicated you were asking generally. Yes, there are risks to the pregnant person trying to self-abort as well. Those risks would also factor in to any judgement about “responsibility”.

It may help to keep in mind that wishing him dead is not incompatible with believing the state should not kill him.

Roof should be dead.

That’s likely true in most cases. But it is still a risk. If you are going to talk about a pregnant person’s “responsibility” to their fetus you have to categorize it accurately.

Your question assumes that there are no risks associated with continuing the pregnancy and giving birth. The choice is not between “damaging the child for life” and effortlessly birthing a healthy child who will be instantly whisked away. Rather you are asking whether a pregnant person has a responsibility to risk…