@SirNose: well, an employee still has to stand there and tell you what to do...

@Elhigh: I carry a fire extinguisher in case a passenger desides to light up a cigarette...

@Fodder650: I liked it better when the CTS-V was only available with a stick... no automatic available.

@Daveinva: on the 'why keep fighting it' note.... if some ugly things have been said in public, his friends may be wondering about what kind've character he is... and his employees may be wondering how ethical he is...

@$kaycog: That's kind've my camp too.

@magzalez: or that you are not going to answer your desk phone if they try and call you the moment your e-mail comes in.

@vrillusions: the best is when someone suggests that a discussion be taken offline when in a meeting with 4 people... that was specifically organized to discuss issues with witnesses. what is offline anyways if you are sitting there talking to someone to their face? Nebraska?

@bighead: too much... In 2008, one of the major accounting firms pushed out a company wide update to remove the "reply-all" button from their e-mail client due to a mistake or two when inappropriate responses were sent to everyone instead of just the intended recipient.

@lhed: I regret that I do this... in part because if someone forwards my e-mail, Outlook drops the address and just leaves my name. After several fools have asked you for your e-mail address (or called you just to confirm which entry you are in the phone book, even though you are the only person with that name), you…

@phicaluk: the best is one someone e-mails a distribution list (that is stupidly not controlled), and 20 replies (using reply-all) follow about how the e-mail does not belong on the distribution...

@SherryB: I have always used "thanks" or "regards"... if the person is being an a##, I may throw a "best regards" in there.

@$kaycog: It might also mean that you are cheap.

@JEmlayUSA: wait a minute here... your logic is flawed...

@wætherman: correction - the same benefits are provided, but the cost of the coverage is no longer untaxed... it is treated as compensation (because it is an additional benefit), which is taxed just the same as your employer paying for your supper when you work late.

@AkkiRonin: never mind the fact that dual income couples pay more taxes once they are married...

@marzer: +1

@Xterm11: Return of the Rhyme: do we really need change?

what the heck?... is google going to start paying gay and lesbian employees more to compensate for the inability to file taxes as 'married filing jointly' too?

@sam4sb: hate to see what those things look like in another 15 years. That is not good for all the connective tissues that keep those things perky in your youth.

@Mecharine: ignorance of laws is not an excuse... The MPAA is alleged to have instructed the police that the matter was not in their interest to pursue, and that the incriminating material should be deleted.