Ive always heard “cocksucker” is the magic word. Pretty much anything directly to the umpire’s person rather than a generality is going to get an ejection. “That was a shitty call” vs “You are a shitty umpire.”

They did not specifically state that testimony wasn’t evidence. I think it is pretty clear they are referring to the fact that it probably quite a bit harder to convince a jury without physical/forensic evidence. No need to call anyone fuckface Humblebragger, esq. ;)

Im assuming the player for Mississippi State is one of the defendants as the article states both of them now play for that school.

I got into an argument with a friend about this. I would much rather have a solid defensive lineman or linebacker for five years than a “transcendent” kicker with my second round pick. The role player is going to add a lot more value than a guy who occasionally hits a field goal longer than a guy you could pick up off…

I’d like to believe it is the former.

It’s almost like he didn’t see the ads run by Clinton with scared, crying Muslim children talking about being afraid that they would be made to exit the country.

That is quite an impressive back bend.

I’d have to disagree. His teammate clearly has a large grin on his face.

You must be new here.

Lost it.

Don’t you worry about that!

Seconded, this guy sucks. There is a way to approach a matter when you feel like you have or in reality have received poor customer service and being a dick to someone who runs a twitter account for the company isn’t it. And he isn’t trying to solve future problems for anyone else he is acting like a weasel and trying…

Yea, I am pretty sure only someone who hasn’t gone through puberty yet would leave those unbuttoned.

I would say that murdering someone over a video game system qualifies as “dangerous offender”