franklinonfood
FranklinonFood
franklinonfood

Feeling a little self-conscious after I called you crybaby defender of PhD holders who say dumb things about vaccines are we? Good thing you’d didn’t defend an actor you pretend to know nothing about for several days in the most juvenile way possible, huh?

Oh, right. All your posts to me say otherwise.

No, but it still makes Rogers Achings Ticker’s hissyfit about someone other than them posting stuff about actresses whose works they are completely unfamiliar with all the more interesting than your post.

Is that what you’re doing? It looks more like your insisting that someone with a degree can’t also say dumb things about vaccines all while pretending you know nothing about the actor you’ve pledged to defend to the death...

You should keep talking about it then.

And you’re a better person for pointing it out, or something...

Of course you don’t know anything about the characters played by the actor you’ve been obsessively defending, you just do it because you’re a selfless defender of PhD holders who say dumb things about vaccines - give yourself the pat on the back you feel you deserve.

Your fanboy defense of her would say otherwise. Who are you trying to convince by saying that, me, anyone impressed that you read her op-ed in the New York Times, or yourself?

But your totally not obsessive defense of her, her degree and her anti-vax ramblings is on the up and up because...only you’re allowed to comment on the actress who played Amy Farrah Fowler? As her fictional brother once emoted, “Woah!”.


But not disappointing enough for you to not go full “Leave Mayim alone!” in your defense of her PhD-enhanced anti-vax views... Huh.

Gotcha - the PhD you’re obsessing over gives Bialik’s attempts to make others forget her anti-vax views more validity, just as it gives validity to everything she does in your eyes, from her blog ramblings in the New York Times to how she feeds children old enough to chew their own food. We will all remember the day

It does to Rogers Aching Ticker, but let’s see how the Big Bang Theory superfan says otherwise.

No, you’re just here to obsess over her PhD and how it gives her anti-vax talk more cachet than Wright’s - your preference has been noted.

That’s right, because only your interest in a random celebrity is valid - if this defense of your girl doesn’t get you that autographed picture, nothing will.

I’ll assume her PhD makes her breastfeeding her four year old child equally less idiotic to a Blossom-stan like yourself.

Seeing how you assume I missed that fact, does her PhD in neuroscience make her anti-vax beliefs less idiotic than Wright’s?

Back in 2015 Bialik had a complicated relationship with vaccines, saying her family doesn’t believe in vaccinations and plugging books by an anti-vaccine activist one minute, then saying of course she vaccinated her kids, she was just asking questions when called on it; I will give you she may be the smartest person

Back in 2015 Bialik had a complicated relationship with vaccines, saying her family doesn’t believe in vaccinations and plugging books by an anti-vaccine activist one minute, saying of course she vaccinated her kids, she was just asking questions when called on it; I will give you she may be the smartest person to

Just as Mayim Bialik showed with her Amy Farrah Fowler character, just because you play a smart person doesn’t mean you’re actually smart.

“There’s blood in my stool.”

The best part of this lawsuit is that it has to refer to the plaintiff as Mr. Love.