The flaw in your mockery is that guys would be more offended by the implication that they need Viagra than by the application of the term "slut."

"who feeds on attention"

I saw his bit about "Fuck the Jews." It wasn't exactly gut-busting, but clever at times.

@avclub-e1b39c7fa22304c2ee8919ac378c3d42:disqus Not free passes, but some leeway, because it's taken as given that they're not being serious. Obviously, there are still lines that can be crossed, it's just those lines are pushed back a ways from where they lie for political commentators.

I like the cut of your jib, mister.

Isn't "nappy-head" what British racists call Arabs?

Too bad there isn't a commenter called "MeltedButter 1."

See, this is why the word doesn't work. Vaginas are great, Rush Limbaugh is terrible, and I really don't want to mentally associate the two.

If we have to discount people's opinions just because they believe in bizarre mythology, why, we'd have to discount the opinions of every religious per—

Eh, about as ugly as Louis. They'd be perfect for each other.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

I dunno, Ice-T just leaves me cold.

Fuck.

It's that furrowed brow of his. Like a cartoon villain, even when he smiles, he looks angry.

Ah, I have heard good things about that. I'll give it a shot.

Eh, in 300 he's a weedy, sniveling colluder, not The Villain.

Uh… no.

I was instantly reminded of "John Tucker Must Die." And you have no idea how upset that makes me.

Would you prefer Phipps to be more taciturn?

John Carter… of EUurrRRTH?