The "rushed port" also ran at a higher framerate and had full 16:9 support.

Trust me, you don't want a Zelda game anouced now when it hasn't even been a year since the last one.

Actually Sega lost the 5th and 6th :/

MAKE AN ACTION/RTS.

It very rarely matters what hardware a games console is packing.

Probably because they're too cool for 3DSs.

Wow.... I was convinced we were were talking about Mass Effect there for a second.

Of course it's alive, dead consoles don't sell 50,000 units a week.

nevermind

Yeah, I think I might try and get into graphic novels.

>but it would've been nice to be able to just sit around and watch the world

That'd be sweet if I didn't already have a PS3 and Vita.

Why no games though, that's the question.

Unfortunately for the manufacturers, 3rd party devs have hissy fits if 1st party software consistently outsells their software. This is generally the case since 1st party content is usually higher quality (although 3rd parties don't really care about that).

Crysis 1 was a different situation. It was a late console port which means it was not originally developed with consoles in mind. It was a better game than Crysis 2 was almost certainly held back by the devs actually keeping console limitations in mind when making the game. I'm fine with consoles being able to play…

I really don't get what you're trying to say....

>missing out on nice little details

Haha no.

Er... yes?

Consoles need to stay away from PC games, period.