But those buttons are not in the right place.

No, of course not, who the fuck would want to post their gaming status on an external social media outlet primarily centred around borderline narcissistic personality disorder? Because that is the social network that the 360 and PS3 are on board with.

>Having the buttons above the analog sticks is a much more natural position that allows your thumb to cover the two closest buttons in a natural fit,

>How many people do you know who get a lot of use out of the 360's / PS3's social networking services?

>when the likelihood is only a tiny number of people are going to get any form of use out of this.

>FPSes don't control well with it

>it'll be uncomfortable and terribly inefficient

Are you implying social networking is in some way a niche market?

No, but they were the first to integrate it on a post-crash console main controller.

Actually Xenoblade was 1st party and The Last Story was a co-operative 3rd party title.

How I do wish people understood what the generations meant.

But I didn't say they had the right to copy.

Failing would only be the right word to use if you enjoy putting your money in a blender and setting it to liquidise.

Do you have a Vita?

Probably why they announced another controller in case you don't like this one.

Nintendo - d-pad, analogue sticks, shoulder buttons, analogue shoulder buttons, diamond ABXY face buttons, Start and select.

Because that is the neutral thumb position.

And you don't have to bother admitting that the PS2 had vastly more shovelware than the Wii could even dream off, because the numbers actually exist.

>One of the reasons Nintendo keeps failing

I'm sure Grandpa SNES controller will be along shortly.