formerhillstaff
FormerHillStaff
formerhillstaff

Sure, there were legitimate criticisms of Harris’ record as a prosecutor. But here is where the hypocrisy really bothers me. Sanders spent almost the entirety of the 1990's voting for a series of “tough on crime” “mandatory sentencing” bills, not just the 1994 Crime Bill that his supporters try to explain away. He

Why would a famously anti-bank candidate select an AG who famously did not prosecute a bank when given the opportunity?

For some reason, Clint Eastwood and the other makers of Richard Jewell decided that the tragic story needed a retelling with the addition of a spicy suggestion that Kathy Scruggs fucked for tips.

“IF REQUIRED.”

Fuuuuuuuuuuuck Mayor Pete. His comments about her in this article make fire shoot out of my eyes.

I’m a Warren supporter and I am unhappy with Joe and Pete’s tactics, but you need to lay off the gay slurs.

It’s the same ridiculous tone policing that white men have been doing for eons. And note that Bernie Sanders literally yells (which I’m absolutely fine with btw) and he is rarely taken to task for it. Warren is even tempered in comparison, but that doesn’t stop the tone policing.

Isn't Biden's entire platform "I will fight Trump in the parking lot"? The difference is Warren wants to fight for the people and Biden just wants to be a tough guy for his own ego.

Yes! And along those lines these two things can also be true: 1) Hill’s ex or soon to be ex is douchebag who may have broken the law 2) Hill seems to have poor judgment and not only did she engage in an relationship with someone on her campaign but she may have also engaged in a relationship with a staffer. That shows

Katie Hill was the victim of revenge porn, but let’s be clear. She had a sexual relationship with a staffer, and then she lied about it. It’s too bad that her ex chose the revenge porn angle rather than simply reporting what she did to the newspaper or congressional authorities. But I, for one, am glad it came to

Yeah Nancy Pelosi is the real problem here. I mean, maybe Madame Speaker is a little busy trying to impeach a president and save the republic from impending fascism?

Each representative has a limited amount of minutes to ask their questions; uncooperative witnesses know this; so they purposely fill up the time by rambling and not answering the questions (Jeff Session and William Barr are masters at it).  So she nipped that in the bud and claimed back her time.  Do you not know how

I’ve found the loudest screamers of “east coast elite” are in fact east coast conservative white collar men who feel oppressed because they had to go a diversity training 15 years ago and won’t shut up about it. 

What I don’t get is why people seem to be falling over themselves to get this contingent of white middle aged men on their wagon, who seem to make decisions based on mostly on some illogical sniff test. It’s been shown time and again that you can win without appealing to this voting block at all, so why do people

Quite. Anyone who thinks Pelosi has thrown “The Squad” under the bus clearly hasn’t seen what happens to members who actually are on Pelosi’s bad side.

Speaking of which, has anyone seen Rep. Moulton lately?

Those four women are not “under a bus.”

When most of your platform seems to be “everything is pretty fine the way it is but I’m gay,” it doesn’t exactly come off as inspiring.

Everybody wants to see their team kicking @ss and taking names. If Pelosi is not your team (and Ashley admits that she isn’t), then this scene is not going to move you.

The longer this campaign goes on, the less likeable he becomes.

I am not quite moved by a still of Pelosi simply doing her job