You previously stated that you did not read my response, which is it? Nor was I being judgmental, I simply pointed out an ironic fact. It is a rough world out there, welcome to the internet.
I have never looked up up "white snack" once.
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with those bikes. What category are those? Medium bikes? They're so uncommon these days. My 2005 Mustang GT runs a 7.93 @90.02 on the 1/8 mile.
What is this glorious sound you speak of? Must be some kind of blasphemy. Electric green is the only way. The rest of you are baby rapists and killers.
You stated "With it being electrically driven the designers pretty much got a clean slate with which to design the bike, and yet they chose to make it look like every other sport bike on the planet. It just screams lazy". Which is completely wrong, and it does not bother me in which you have read my post or failed to…
If you were given the opportunity, would you become a WRC or GRC driver? I say GRC because 600hp rally car.
they said that is what the engine can make. But the engine makaes as much as it's controller produces. So I highly doubt this is the number you're gonna have wheb you buy one. We have to wait until they tell us what kW controller they use or dyno numbers
the link is broke
Okay, a car that is gonna beat a bike is gonna run you a good 120,000. Wherea brand new R6 is gonna run 11,000 and bust a brand new corvette to 120. Oh and a ZX-10R does 0-150 in ten seconds and out corners a SLS which probably doesn't even know how to corner.
Wanna race? I have a Mustang, and I have ridden an SV 650 before. It didn't start or accelerate as fast as my Mustang does, which is a 2005 GT. My R6 which puts 128 at the rear wheels with 60mph winds (dyno with a dyno fan) is fun as hell to ride. Although I'm considering a ZX-10R, and remember, it's not all about…
Judging from what you say, you aren't very familiar with aero dynamics on bikes are you? That big opening on the front? Whay you expect them to close that so the bike can't do more than 100 mph and become insanely unstable. Destroy the range per battery. Destroy acceleration.
I have an 05 stang. Whether I'm low RPM cruising, or idling. Heads turn. Then again mine is no typical stang. But I'm know to kick myself in the ass, because those tires are expensive as hell, and it is way to easy to drop the clutch. 295 rear, on a 20 inch rim, 10.5 wide.
yeah but they are still fun on a day to day basis. Roomy. Heated seats. Pretty retro insides. And ESPICIALLY fun if you live in a rural area like me. Most roads have rubber marks somewhere. I sure as hell know my road has quite a few. After driving the BRZ. It handles tight, but it can't handle inertia likenmy stang,…
This retro. Mustang does retro. 2005 -2014. Dem sales numbers. Oh and Camaro does retro too. Again, dem sales numbers. Challenger was never that retro inside. Pretty damn retro on the grill and tail. But thats about it. Now it is sporty badass retro everywhere with three pedles, supercharged whine, and over 600hp. Yes…
it has a badass startup and idle. Then a massive leaf blower kicks in. Or that's how it sounds at least.
That is incorrect, sir. With due respect, Ford owned Volvo from 1999 to 2010.
Did you not read all of it? It is a Ford engine. Developed bt Yamaha. Considering Ford used to own Volvo. Really you are right, and so am I. It really is more of a Volvo engine than anything else. After all, it was from the design of Volvo. Also, remember Yamaha and Ford have in the past held hands.
Unlimited Class, anything goes.
I could go twins and bust all kinds of Termi's, but they just have that look that none of the other SN95's have.