foldable
foldable
foldable

I’m assuming that a condition of all this is her not running again. I say she’d still take the deal.

There’s obviously no plausible scenario where any of this happens. But if she was swept into office with two-thirds support in the Senate and a mandate to investigate and repair the damage to the Executive Branch? That would be an invitation to Get Shit Done at a fantastical pace, implement the safeguards she’s

In young Ben’s defense, I’m sure he acknowledges the Holocaust occurred and is glad that it weeded out so many effete cosmopolitans.

Oh, right, I forgot that she’s a power-mad harridan bent on endless war and neoliberal tyranny.

I mean, why even go anywhere when it’s basically the same content?

To be fair, it’s not exactly an original mistake.

He’s not a neo-Nazi

Righteous Leftists will be along shortly to inform you that America has always been exactly as bad as it is now and if you don’t realize that you’re the problem.

I, too, want to defend Kim’s attacks on a US political figure:

It’s varied year to year between 6'2" and 6'4", but I thought it was 6'3" most recently.

Few people hate [the vast majority of] Jews as much as Ben Shapiro. There’s not a speck of dissonance here.

He would be furious at your insinuation that such a thing was the case.

No, it would be explicitly a caretaker Presidency. HRC is, among living people Constitutionally allowed to hold the office, probably the person most able to immediately begin Presidenting without an extended learning period. Her job would be to get a handle on exactly how fucked everything in the Executive Branch is

I’d accept her appointing Hillary as VP then resigning.

The Clintons

That would explain Cetaphil...frankly, better than I would prefer.

Part of me hopes Amash holds his seat at least until MI-3 is solidly blue. He’s bad, but he’s a million times better than the vicious trash mutants like Huizenga and Hoekstra that make up most of the West Michigan GOP. Trading him for one Dem term followed by years of some reactionary Dutch bastard would be a bad deal.

What gets me is how bad they are. It’s not that they’re just worse than seems right, they’re awful. I mean, not even once in his career has his DBPM been non-negative. His Defensive Rating has always been worst among regular Warriors players. And yet he’s uncontroversially on an All Defense team.

There’ve been so many more in the interim.

Their stated inspiration. Reactionary misogynists largely want a repressive theocracy (whether based on existing religion or some pseudo-scientific equivalent), and hatred of women’s sexual liberation is an obvious motivator for religious extremists (The ‘72 virgins’ thing, though hugely overplayed, isn’t