i’m just saying treat them equally. it’s not a hard concept.

*too comfortable.

Yeah, because that’s the most important take away here. Why is it that whenever something like this happens the immediate reaction by some is “oh no, this will give conservatives ammo”. Maybe the correction reaction should be “oh no, why does shit like this keep happening”. It’s like how Trump is blamed for…

how exactly is saying that someone shouldn’t be elected because of their religion, or committing vigilante acts against minority groups a “questionable thing”? your double standards are showing.

yeah, saying that the “FPI has done some questionable things over the years” is a ridiculous understatement. no one would mince words like that if they were a Christian organization. all of the (former) gawker sites have a habit of holding groups to different standards, depending on whether it fits with their…

that is the entire point of our legal system, and if you are doing it for everyone i wholeheartedly support you. that said, in my experience reading stories on this site concerning rape allegations, there is a real difference between how the accused is treated based on things like race, religion, political…

“Gosh, wealthy powerful white men have it so tough, it’s lucky for them that we’re all willing to work so hard to give them the benefit of the doubt when it comes to sexual assault.”

“I always side with victims and believe victims. But I also am open to the possibility that these accusations are funded by Republican operatives.”

the old benefit of the doubt for democrats eh?

“my take is that if something offensive requires a lengthy explanation into why it offends, I can’t be that bothered by it.”

To earn money. To help his career. There are a ton of reasons.

Some of the Jenners seem ok. Emphasis on ok.

“Fuck this clickbait family. All of them.”

and if the cops didn’t show up i riot gear, they’d be blamed if the protest turns violent, and they don’t protect property in minority neighborhoods. look at ferguson. the media blamed the cops for showing up in riot gear AND for failing to capably respond when some in the protest started to riot. pick one.

Yeah, conflicted. My gut reaction is to assume anything that Trump does is wrong, but I’m not sure in this specific instance. I don’t hate the move, but have a feeling Trump really didn’t think it out very well. Wonder how this will escalate things.

we haven’t gotten calendars yet. no way to know.

1) your definition of hate crime is not accurate. hate crime laws have no mention of “dominant” or “marginalized” groups. it’s solely a crime committed based on racial, sexual or some other prejudice. contrary to what you are implying, hate crimes can be committed against a member of a purported “dominant” class.

this has nothing to do with Trump. Trump is horrible, but every terrible thing that happens in this world isn’t directly tied to him. it becomes an issue of the boy who cried wolf. if you keep blaming Trump for things that he didn’t actually cause, it diminishes the instances when he gets blames for things he actually…

he went to jail for catcalling? i can agree that it’s something that people shouldn’t do, but i don’t know if actual jailtime makes sense.

Are we sure that the Riddler is even a top 5 Batman villain?