No, but I think when the subject is US political consultants, working on US elections, on a US website, in a conversation that’s likely pretty much mostly Americans...I’m going to with “yes, dear, that’s what we’re talking about”.

I was looking in hockey too: 1945 Toronto Maple Leafs won Stanley cup, despite 24 goals for / 30 goals against....

Why would I care who won the popular vote?

Or the 1960 world series: Pirates scored a total of 27 runs (& won the series) vs the Yankees 55 runs.

You might want to look up what “democratic republic” means.

A Republican wasn’t elected against the will of “the people”.

Well, we were told that criticizing the occupant of the White House was “rank disrespect,” as Jonathan Capehart wrote in the Washington Post. Opposition to the sitting president was very likely motivated by racism, Charles M. Blow mused in The New York Times. “Openly defying and brazenly disrespecting your president,…

“Organized labor has the potential to be one of the great forces for equality and sanity in our nation over the next four years.”

Do you just wake up in the morning fueled by hatred and venom?

That’s the problem with being a zealot; in this case your narratives “women are always the victim” and “Republicans (esp Trump) are the devil” get confused and paradoxical when, say, a woman does what she wants and doesn’t pursue your narrative.

You need to understand that the only PROPER response to Trump is breast-beating, garment-rending, wailing, teeth-gnashing tears.

“...feels strongly that everyone in the world must know how shallow and self-serving her personal decisionmaking process is...”

I will, no really.

I will, no really.