flyentologist-old
Flyentologist
flyentologist-old

@iGoldman: But like the others have said, the removal of LAN is pretty god damned retarded.

Honestly, I'll be playing B.Net if I were on SC2 more than I'd be playing the campaign. So if I plan to play it, I'd be online anyways. This does not bother me in the least.

@Shawnrw222: If this was EA, AND it were the same thing Ubisoft did ((which it is not)), then we'd be upset.

@SecCom: I exaggerated that number for irony sake.

Gears of War 3 is more important than an 8 year old lesbian.

@SecCom: Well, right, I meant the PC people. But it's the same thing in the end.

@thaKingRocka: But we can still have average things at huge prices. It's better than nothing.

The $15 I won't be spending on this says that well more than half the people complaining about it here bought it.

@paulrules: I thought any sort of contract there once was was voided after that big lawsuit.

@VincentGrey: And $60 every year for a "new" Madden game.

@mruler360: If only that were possible.

@JonathanATTY: A non-profit organization receiving donations isn't quite the same thing. But either way, I've already said, they CAN sue, and win, but would they? Probably not. A cease and desist is likely on the way though.

I can count in neither hand, since I've never used the PS3/Wii browser, or Facebook on my 360. If I have an internet connection to get on Xbox Live or PSN, then I probably have my laptop sitting nearby, in which case I'll just use that.

@Decoy_Doctorpus: Nintendo is a stickler when it comes to their IP, but I dunno if they'd sue for this. I mean, the church isn't making profit off of it or anything. There's no real point.

@Hongo: Disney would sue you broke for doing this though.

"that don't have time for a full-on game of StarCraft"

@Adhominem: Why have RAM that you won't use?