That brother and sister are definitely fucking.

You don’t have to distance from your household members unless they are under quarantine or infected. Unless the political press and paps are all housemates, then it’s a fine scolding.

Berate? It was a harmless interaction with the press.

Isn’t an unlicensed dermatologist just a criminal?

As someone who lived in South Korea for a year, please enlighten me (and the rest of us) on the canine dietary habits of the Korean population.

It’s insensitive because it assumes that small dogs ARE on the menu at Korean restaurants, which is patently false.

Here’s some advice: Read what Leno said and then ask yourself, “If I were Korean, would I appreciate what he said about my culture”? You don’t have to be a part of the group(s) being stereotyped to see…

“I get that people are offended by racist jokes, but I personally wasn’t offended by this one so it isn’t the same.”

Yeah, dealing in lazy stereotypes about Asians eating family pets is totally not racist, yo!

I’m guessing you’re not Korean.

Everyone once in a while I’ll read an article about Remini and her anti-Scientology campaign and I’ll catch myself thinking “move on from this already,” but then I remember that the people behind Scientology are fucking evil and ruin peoples’ lives and I think - actually Leah, continue to fuck their shit up and don’t…

Let’s change that!

It seems a little weird to have an article about a performer being erased from videos that doesn’t include a picture of the performer?

If it’s not part of the ceremony as written then it’s not supposed to happen.

I assume they quit in support of the four kids who got arrested, and that if he hasn’t already, the complainant will have to change schools. 

Did you see her instagram stories this weekend of her and her friends opening a bottle of wine with a nail and hammer because they forgot a wine key??? I love her so freaking much; that’s exactly the kind of representation I want in Congress.

This absolutely warrants nastiness. The fact that the First Amendment does not guarantee *this particular dude* the absolute right to have *this particular speech* heard by *this particular woman* is so absolutely clear it can be dismissed on the pleadings. This judge’s actions are appalling.

If it's 2, why force AOC to testify? He can appoint an expert to explain it to him, can't he?

So if they rule against AOC that means TRump can’t block anyone else, amirite?

Men, continuing the disappointment. 

This is why engagement in a contemporary civil society is so important, even on micro and macro levels. A sitting judge is essentially “mansplaining” his ignorance of 21st century communications and politics. And punting it to a sitting member of Congress. It is so offensive on so many levels. I sincerely hope…