flazlo
Flazlo
flazlo

The most generous thing you can say about McCaskill’s diatribe is that she is focused exclusively on the demographics of Missouri and states like that. It’s probably accurate to say that Ocasio-Cortez’s platform might not appeal to the voters McCaskill has cultivated in her three terms.

The “Trump’s bad tweets is causing markets to crash” argument makes sense if you accept the premise that markets are, ultimately, irrational, unpredictable, and at the mercy of a broad range of human cognitive failures.

I think our economy is a lot weaker than it would appear, in that the recovery after the financial crisis really wasn’t a recovery for average people, and the that crisis erased a lot of wealth for working poor, lower middle class, and middle class people.

‘ “This is tyranny of talk radio hosts, right? And so, how do you deal with that?” said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn). “You have two talk radio hosts who completely flipped the president. And so, do we succumb to tyranny of talk radio hosts?”’

“I’m proud that I pulled in both the former head of news at Fox News and the former head of news at NPR...”

This should be no surprise, because Chait regularly harries and hurls brickbats at teacher’s unions in his advocacy for charter schools.

I feel you, man - same.

If I may propose a theory:

Robert Of Mueller and his villien James are Faste Friends, one of Manye foul and wicked Plots and Ciphers this vile pair does persue. Bye the Bye, was not the lady who harried and worried the truehearted Jerome (whom I know not) the same charged with more plotting and foul deceit amongst the Clintons? A Hunt for

You used the numbers that the paper explicitly said did not represent the total number as the total number.

True. And, the Republicans are dismantling representative where they can. But the Republicans are literally old and dying. Like, right now.

Alternate (not mutually exclusive):

Stopping Trump from getting any funding for his wall would be getting something done.

After a skim, my first thoughyt is that if you deem the motivation of researchers who present data to be very important, how do you think I should approach you ignoring a paragraph in that paper you cited that pretty much invalidates the assertion you make, citing an earlier paragraph - in the same paper?

Any. Chit. Democrats. Think. They’ll. Get. Is. Worthless.

I’d like to contrast this:

Schumer is, most likely, the source of this. Not to discount the fecklessness of other Senate Democrats, of course, but to point out that successfully primarying Schumer in New York would do two very good things - get rid of him (because he’s worse than useless) and send a clear message to other Dems.

“>Have you heard of those?-Do you support them?”

Yes, generally, because people with guns can harm themselves or others, and (in theory) we’ve tasked the judicial system with preventing people from being shot and killed. There’s always tension between enforcing law and personal rights - not every imposition on the

Perhaps, but I’m not talking about the bad things other people are doing, I’m talking about the United States long history with racism and white supremacy, Fox News’ role in stoking racial hatred and resentment, and Greenwald acting as a rhetorical prop in that effort.

Heard this on NPR this morning. I hope shouting at the radio is healthy, because I’ll live forever.