I thought Jalopnik was based in the land of the free, am I not entitled to my opinion and be able to voice it? You could as easily avoid reading to and replying to my comments. At least you can avoid the comments and read the article. I've been reading Jalopnik for years, it still has lots of original format type…

If there were Jalopnik posts promoted on FA you would have a valid argument. The fact you don't know that Saab cars and the Saab the article refers to are not the same company, and have not been for probably long than you have been alive, means you really have no substantiating view point what so ever.

Jalopnik has always been an automotive blog that has included posts from other blogs where there has been an interest crossover. Its not a ship/plane/train/car centric hub.

I do like FA, its just that I go to Jalopnik to read about cars and related things. If I want to read about aerospace I go to Flightclub or FA. Just trying give some constructive feedback, there appear to be many FA posts that get promoted on Jalopnik and not the other way around. I don't mind cross promotion when…

I do like FA, its just that I go to Jalopnik to read about cars and related things. If I want to read about aerospace I go to Flightclub or FA. Just trying give some constructive feedback, there appear to be many FA posts that get promoted on Jalopnik and not the other way around. I don't mind cross promotion when…

Why Tyler, why? Almost everyday you cross post non car related stuff on Jalopnik from FA, if people want to ready about military bollocks we know where to find it.

You're............makes your post a lot more comprehensible, don't worry though I'll keep an eye on your mistakes and help you correct them

Using the correct you're would have made your post comprehendible but it wouldn't have made up for the idiocy of it as you failed to fully grasp the purpose my my post.

You're not your...........and I was on Jalopnik when I posted as this article has nothing to do with automobiles, a hard concept to grasp I know, but do try please.

I thought that was Rand-McNally where they wear hamburgers for shoes?

The fact is Honda have made good engines, not that their engines are good, and we will never know if the one intended for the Brawn was good or not. Renault have made some good engines, their current one is a dog and their 80's turbo era ones were powerful but very brittle.

If, buts and maybes

Very true, the Brawn was a rebadged Honda, Ross Brawn was so confident in the ability of his chassi design that he put it all on the line to keep the team going. How much difference the engine made I'm not sure, but the Honda chassis was very good. So that's 2, maybe 3, GP cars that Honda made that were pretty good,…

It would not be allowed, you cannot just ask for a certain plate as they are issued by DVLA and ones that look like they spell something are sold at auction, but that doesn't stop you from having the plates made up at a store.

A long time ago, in galaxy far far away Jalopnik used to be an automotive blog

Awesome but...................not their cars, just cars with their engines. When Honda built the cars they were generally shit.

Gotta disagree, TG USA has improved immeasurably since they stopped copying the original. The studio sections were so lame it was embarrassing, but now it's mainly based on challenges it has come into its own. I really enjoy the challenge with a road test at the end as a reward, it brings a slightly different twist to…

WTF, Flash?!

Perhaps its the language you used. 'Based off' to me sounds like you meant it was the kubelwagen in new shoes, rather than a modern version of the Kubelwagen which is exactly what it is. Same idea, similar in looks but not the same vehicle.

It's not pedantry just fact, the Thing is not based on the kubelwagen but it is a late 60's interpretation. Would you say the current VW Beetle is based off the original?