Hey, Dan has to eat and if he doesn't hit his contractual Trump hate quota he doesn't get paid.
Hey, Dan has to eat and if he doesn't hit his contractual Trump hate quota he doesn't get paid.
Would you think the same if the references were regarding a different group?
Defending racism.
"Lately" seems to cover a lot of ground considering that list goes back as far as 1999.
Decorum is absolutely subjective.
This is a crazy person rant.
I wonder if I've been blocked for reprehensible things. That would be disappointing.
Yes, I constantly revise the grammar of my comments, the point however has not changed.
So you're agreeing that my original point was correct? That's what I'm seeing here.
Your words are right there. I don't need to fool anyone.
No, thank you.
You've just posted only 30% were actually raped.
So that is the absurd study that conflates rape with rape threats (which is 18% of the number of rapes reported) and unwanted sexual contact.
That link is about false reporting, which has nothing to do with my question about 6% of rapists going to jail.
Doesn't that 6% jailed figure come from a study that includes threats and unwanted sexual contact as rape?
Depicting violence against women is rape culture?
Use their slogans and people will confuse you for them. Pretending that neutrality about things like rape culture and racism is acceptable is right from their handbook.
Now tell me about how it's about ethics in games journalism.
I can implicate them for a lack of position. Neutrality in the face of rape culture is no virtue.
To state and dismiss the allegation without any of considerable context is a disservice to the victim.