An actual example of it going wrong would be an argument worth reading. How about some substance with that snark?
An actual example of it going wrong would be an argument worth reading. How about some substance with that snark?
It's reprehensible, and a large part of why the media push to defend Gawker has disenfranchised me.
" I detest self-important ****heads with more money than god and the pull to get whatever they want, whenever they want, more."
He's already moved most of his money to the Hungary and the Caymans. The rich don't suffer consequences like the rest of us.
That's a pretty big list you accrued here. I suppose that answers the question.
Nick Denton, owner of Gawker, is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. To cast him and his organization as a powerless victim under the weight of Thiels money is absurd.
Or maybe the other suits also have merit? Given the Gawker track record, it seems to fit.
Ah, yes that poor multi-millionaire Nick Denton being picked on by that billionaire Peter Thiel.
When have they published revenge porn?
It's frightening that revenge porn be punished?
True, but nothing says pain like three Widowmakers using their ults at the same time.
I thought "positivity" in this case was transparently coded phrasing for "adheres to AV Club's agenda."
At least 76 has team utility with the heal.
It is, I maintain, one of the best episodes of television in the history of the medium. He's lucky to have been involved.
MTV's demographic isn't primarily interested in nuanced feminist empowerment? I'm shocked.
He barely beat Clay even after he spread rumors about Clay saying racist stuff.
Screeners and sloppy timing?
How does it explain Nick voting for Aubry?
Nope, Nick and Joe voted for Aubry. All the women are misogynists.
Nope. Nick voted for Aubry.