"And I never said or implied in any way that it permits anyone in real
life to force themselves upon someone who has rape fantasies."

Your being a little pedantic and, unintentionally a little gross.

All the older people that I know who watched Stewart pretty much dropped the show. With Stewart he was a blend of comedian and newscaster, but I think Noah is too young for a lot of people to take seriously as newscaster.

Considering the shots of him mirrored Solverson in episode 1, I think it's more that just a simple cliche. I mean "Indian trackers" tend to not hunt in auto body shops.

Says you.

It's interesting that the split screen connects Hahnzee and Solverson in their investigation methods.

Really?

Given your other comment, I'm just going to assume you're batshit and move on.

Okay, you're crazy. Got it.

Are you just making things up? I have no idea what you are talking about.

What?

What?

Nope.

Is Mr Freely there? First initials I.C.

I'm willing to agree to disagree, save one point:

How is bringing someone else up "distracting" from the debate. You don't need to respond to me, and you certainly didn't need to attack me for it. Again, this isn't debate club, there is no timer and things are only as derailed as you derail them. It's a conversation and by bringing up people defending Polanski, I…

Smart is sexy.

I was making fun of you. This isn't Debate Club, and arguing like you've got the wikipedia fallacy page on tab isn't a way to win.

And I never defended Polanski. I sincerely wish he spent the rest of his life in prison. Hell, I wish they had time travel to throw him in prison in back in the seventies. For some reason you took merely bringing up Dunham's defenders as a defense of Polanski, which is creepy. Are people not allowed to rail…

"Say what you will about Jared Subway's kiddie porn and child rape, the man made some good commercials.That's how I feel about people who defend Polanski as a person."