Fortunately, the appreciation of someone of your mettle is worth about as much as your opinions related to concussions and hockey. AKA: nothing more than something to mock.
fintail
fintail
Yeah, there’s a hidden camera or something around here.
This is a joke, right? This has to be a joke. Even the most self-unaware Bruins fan can’t be this bad.
Am I on candid camera or something? Compared to you, a black hole is full of hot air.
LOL yeah, reading for comprehension.
Sorry, I am not good at typing slow enough to be understood by deflecting Mass stereotypes. Good day, good luck, you’ll need it.
He still had terms. The link you posted (SI can be iffy, I admit) said he had not committed and had advised this to interested teams (“significant interest” per the link). Or maybe just like the concussion and injuries, it is all a ruse, all fake news, all lies. Just washed up, injuries and concussions and the risk…
Oh geez. I can’t keep up with your idiocy, that’s for sure. Of course he doesn’t, he’s retired. But he definitely was under terms as he wasn’t playing for free, and people with much more insight than you’ll ever possess into the mechanics and business of the game thought it was a workable deal. But maybe you know…
I never said you needed to play in the NHL (although I sincerely doubt you are working as a scout at any level). Almost like a strawman, but not as insightful. Reading for comprehension will help you in life.
I am saying you are flapping your gums relentlessly about events where you have no real insight, where your opinion will always be foolish and mockable. Effectively accusing him of faking his issues because he is “no longer good at hockey”, it is both amusing and astounding.
Who said anyone owed him anything? All signatories to his contract were there of their own free will. Who are you to judge why he isn’t playing now? Oh! I know the answer to that. Funny you call him “Washed up” yet were no doubt excited under year ago with no such whiny oblivious sentiment.
Yet here you are mentioning their names, bender.
No place is perfect, especially in the devolving Murkan idiocracy, but I’ll take what I’ve got over your gongshow. Thanks
LOL armchair fans have 20/20 hindsight, you’re right there. Right now it seems just awful. But I am sure you thought he was “no longer good at hockey” from the start, and you can easily judge his motives in 11 games out of a 1000+ game career. Yep.
The Bruins had no problem taking him in trade, even with the clear potential of having risks associated with age and prior injury. Maybe they didn’t think he was “no longer good at hockey” either. But if that’s the hill you want to die on, be my guest. I am sure you can teach us all a thing or two.
You know that after a certain point, there’s virtually always an inverse relationship between age and performance. Right? Age matters.
He’s going to be 35 this year. Passing the big 3-0 can result in at least marginal or worse losses in productivity. Bodies age/become more injury prone and slow down with time.
I never said that. You said he was “no longer good at hockey”. Declining (but still decent esp for his age) stats support none of that claim, so one might assume you have deeper insight into some part of the game. Of course, you don’t, and are just pulling it out of your derriere via a quick glance at a stats sheet.
The one on the left is fake, correct?
Not sure which “statistics” show he is “no longer good at hockey”. But someone with your playing and scouting experience can probably teach me a thing or two.