fightingchance-old
FightingChance
fightingchance-old

@moefosho: Is the 954 yours? Tell you friend to take the fakie 'Xenons' out of his F4i, that cheap blue tint looks dumb and is crappy for night riding anyway.

@Luke Courtois: Well, numbers aren't everything. This will drive very different than a base 'stang, store more stuff, and fit in smaller spaces. Different driving experiences - room for everyone, no?

@Tijuana Taxi: I'm more of a fan, but I agree with the first impression of the grill - it looks like it's been forced open to be taller than it should be and leaves the front end looking a little fragile. I would not be surprised in the least if the front nose shape was dictated by the Euro pedestrian impact

@TheSerge: I do need a Z06! :D That's for future moneymaking me though. The Corvette has a love/hate thing going on - I think it's kind of pedestrian and the interior is hopeless, but then you see the HP to dollar ratio (especially on used ones) and it's such a huge value. C5 Z06s are particularly great, a car

@TheSerge: My biggest nit is in fast left-right transitions, especially over uneven pavement (or any kind of quick load-shifting maneuver); hub alignment from the SLA is particularly unsuited for these kinds of physics and the potential energy keeps stacking up until you get that 'boating' effect. Hard to port!

@Brandon Yang: Ohhhh you can't say that. But really, turners have tamed the SLA to produce some pretty good results, at least as far as I've read reviews of various tuner 'Stangs (and even the normal GT). As I age I crave balance and mid-corner harmony more than power, so I too see the SLA as laughable antiquated,

@luisthebeast: Yeah... when the price is said and done, other capable cars start looking really tempting. You have to be particularly smitten with Mustangs to get the value of these examples.

@alan505: Only if you stepped in the leakage.

Make sure you get one of these in one of the boxes, or the order may not be complete

@Americanitis: It's in the best short term (lifetime) interest of 'third base' people to enact and support legislation keeping themselves flush with money at the expense of lower classes.

@A.Jaswal: Suzuki Swift? 130 klicks, sure.

@coryd: The extra wind resistance and revs cars would run at would probably chew up enough extra fuel to require an additional stop to get gas on a trip, negating any time saved on the trip as a whole. Fuel economy dives pretty quickly, especially if a vehicle has a shorter final drive and/or a variable cam system

@pidgeonsplatz: This. I was really surprised how little time I'd make up by going faster when I got my GPS. Like, by going recklessly fast, I'd shave 6 minutes off a trip that took 50 minutes. Not worth it. Now I do 65 max and reap the rewards in gas savings.

@MikeofLA: 'Veyrons Only (minimum speed 180mph/290kph)'