fhqwhgadshgnsdhjsdbkhsdabkfabkveybvf
fhqwhgadshgnsdhjsdbkhsdabkfabkveybvf
fhqwhgadshgnsdhjsdbkhsdabkfabkveybvf

But hey who doesn’t want to destroy a car with no (perceived) consequences?

You rationalize and dismiss all you want. It’s a stupid line, and nobody is gonna look back and remember any of that stuff because relatively speaking it just isn’t important to anyone who doesn’t try their damnedest to make it important in their head.

Nintendo does absolutely nothing like what MS was trying to pull with the X1, lol. To even compare it is silly.

Lol are you kidding? Nintendo get crucified all the time by aforementioned loud internet whingers.

Only to a vocal minority. Like I said elsewhere: do you really think, in the future, the history of Nintendo will be predominantly written about all the great games and consoles they made, or that one time they didn’t do voice chat right or gave the Wii U a silly name?

I think you’re not really reading this right. “Still recognizing its flaws” is not the same as saying something “is synonymous with” its flaws.

If you think the Nintendo’s games and achievements in the industry will have anywhere near the same amount of pages in the history books as “lol they did voice chat weird that one time” then you’re frankly delusional.

No, that’s only a loud minority of people who think about that stuff whenever they see Nintendo. For the vast majority of everyone else, what they do well vastly overshadows any of that. And why wouldn’t it? We’re here for games. If you let the “name of the WiiU” take priority in your mind over some of the best games

Anti-vaxxers are almost directly responsible for child deaths. Their speech should be restricted just like a children’s book writer trying to convince Australian children that “spiders are friends”.

In the past, Nintendo has been synonymous with baffling business decisions and out-of-touch thinking.

The original still looks great to me, in fact I think the high resolution of the remaster feels at odds with the simplistic retro CG-ness of its units and buildings.

Anyone who needs to be reminded of that hasn’t kept up with Lego at all.

Anyone who needs to be reminded of that hasn’t kept up with Lego at all.

Is that supposed to be a rhetorical question? It’s not an FPS. And and even if you were to classify it like that, the first one already had more creativity than the entire multiplayer FPS genre had managed in the past 20 years, so if the sequel doesn’t completely turn the (still novel) concept on its head, that’s OK,

The mark of true greatness in both of them is clear.

Splatoon 2 isn’t on the Wii U. Splatoon 1 is pretty much “over” now that there are no more splatfests.

LOL I’m sorry, did you actually have that in your head all this time? That I thought TR was a console exclusive? Well that’s embarrassing for you.

The music thing was par for the course for PC ports. If you “clearly” were a PC gamer you’d know all about the shit you had to put up with, lol.

320x240 was what was still very average for a PC game and what most console games would almost exclusively run at until five years later when the next gen started. And, again, I’ll keep repeating myself: Tomb Raider was made for consoles, not PC. No music. Dev didn’t give a shit.

At the time it was certainly considered high resolution, and it was higher than intended for the game. Also you keep ignoring that the PC port was missing most of the music. It wasn’t a good version.