ya know what, Gawker consistently omits the race and headshot of black perps, but it’s made clear when the perp was a white guy in the lede here. So racist as they may be, the conservatives have a point about bullshit coverage from left leaning media outlets

I like MLS, but I am fully aware of it’s international standing. But that ball completely changed directions in the air. That’s a wicked shot no matter where oyu play

yeah I mean I really wouldn’t have high expectations for either for various reasons, esp Kap, but def worth a crack on the cheap

no philly fans put batteries in the snowballs

he wasn’t improving under harbaugh that was the problem. That 8-8 year was in part due to injuries, but the offense really struggled because they were consciously trying to do more pocket passing since the Niners routinely got fucked if their D ever let them get behind.

As someone who has seen both a whole lot, I feel the exact opposite.

Both are kicking a lot of ass right now apart.

still by far my fav shoot out move

1) +/- has always been regarded as a bad stat even before those big math numbers you can’t understand came around

eh, as much as I hate him, Malkin is obviously very good. But I don’t see a realistic argument how he’s better than Ovie. He doesn’t have the full rink game of Federov. He’s more like Ovechkin in that regard, .438 career face offs, certainly not known for his D. I think Ovechkin is also the better pure goal scorer

I am not saying it.

there is absolutely no shortage of writers looking for work who are talented and can manage to be creative and critical in that very field without pissing off their sources. That’s basically the basics of the job.

lol i can’t believe this PC bullshit fucking extends to this

Your points were addresssed.

no, they are 100% replaceable. There are a ton of video game sites, so 86ing ones that employ dickheads to write isn’t going to hurt a publisher. The only one losing there is the media company

just because you are oblivious doesn’t mean everyone else was, since it’s been mentioned in comments a ton.

I didn’t say they have more value as a human being, that’s your own little broken brain connecting those dots.

possessing true information is a good reason to publish, yes, but not at the expense of the entirety of your coverage about that organization. That’s the entire point. Taunting with the 2nd post with the emails and snarky story cost Kotaku any support from Bethesda.

and there’s nothing unethical with denying stuff to a dumb writer too stupid to handle basic relationship and source management. No one was arguing this, so I am not sure what your point is?

lol it’s so painfully obvious that you’re googling shit without understanding what you are talking about at all.