Some airplanes have a closet in the cabin for stuff like a wedding dress or other garment bags. I have never in my life heard of someone buying a seat for a wedding dress, though I've heard plenty of stories about good airlines making an effort to help people traveling with a wedding gown.

Yeah, duh. Never said it wasn't. Work on your reading comprehension a little bit, or maybe stay out of conversations you don't understand. If you actually read the conversation, you'd understand that I wasn't talking about the law (I was talking about the sexual motivation of the incidents) and all the other commenter…

Ok, that was poor phrasing on my part. I didn't mean that it's not a hostile work environment, just that it wasn't *just* a hostile work environment. The other commenter kept insisting (to me in a different thread) that these crimes had no sexual or sexist overtones, and that the nude photo theft should be treated as…

Nah, I'm still cool. Never once lost it. It sucks that you're unable to actually argue your silly points though, I was expecting to have a real conversation, but instead, I realized I'm dealing with someone who puts out controversial statements to instigate arguments, and then forces it to devolve into a pointless,…

Lmao. You're talking about what you've done this entire discussion, right? I actually laughed, so good trolling bud.

Dude, we both (ok, at least I) read the whole conversation. I honestly question whether you did, because your only argument was about something we weren't even discussing. You wanted to back away from your initial comments, and if you feel like you need to save face, then whatever. Grow up and learn to admit it when…

Yeah, you've obviously not read any of this, including the above article or any of your "law school" books. Glad you can finally admit it that you've been spewing irrelevant bullshit this entire "discussion."

You're delusional, and definitely not a lawyer. Stop pretending to be one. You're an idiot. You're making up both sides of this argument, ignoring all the points I have made to spout the same stupid shit over and over again (on second thought, maybe you are a lawyer!). Again. I'm not googling statutes (or even citing…

Believe what? Laws are changing, asshole. They continue to change. Do you honestly not know that technology moves faster than the laws? How are you employed in the legal field if you can't understand this? No one is denying that precedents are looked at, but you seem to be ignoring the fact that modernized society…

Oh, ok. Nevermind. I get that you're trolling now. Even an idiot can see that this isn't a "hostile work environment" situation. Carry on and don't bother trying to instigate more bullshit with me.

No, that's not all that matters. You're so completely missing the point. I have a hard time believing that you even work in the legal field, because if you did you'd know that the law changes to adapt to the modern society. 250 years of case law don't have much to do with a completely new circumstance that didn't…

Like I already said, just because the law does not yet considered it a sex crime doesn't mean that it's not sexually motivated and sexually harassing. You're really focused on the way the law looks at things, and my point is that there's obviously more to it than that. The purpose of stealing the photos is entirely…

Yuck. It's scary that someone with as little empathy for sexual harassment issues is working in the criminal justice system. I mean, I know you people are out there, it's just uncomfortable seeing one of you for real. If you can't understand that sexual harassment is an ACTUAL problem and that hacking to steal nude…

"whatever" aka "damn, you got me. I got nothing so I should just admit that I was wrong but I'm incapable of accepting responsibility, as has been demonstrated repeatedly in this conversation."

Yeah, I can tell it's getting really hard for you to defend your weak points by now.

You mean you chose to address the one section of my comment you felt like you could counter at all - but you really can't. Your rationale is so weak that it's completely worthless. A few seconds less time out on the road is not significant. You can't expect to outrun a speeding drunk driver coming towards you, whether…

You know, your refusal to even read or respond to what I wrote really just proves that you're a self-absorbed selfish asshole who can't take responsibility for his actions. You're one of the worst kinds of people, because you destroy things in your path, not because you want to, but because you don't give a shit about…

Surefire way to ignore every valid point I made, to just dismiss the whole thing and pretend it's just a personal attack. Keep on shirking that responsibility, asshole. I hope you and your loved ones are never hit by a drunk driver.

I'm not confusing anything. Did you notice that even in your comments, you're trying to shift the blame for your own communication shortfalls on your readers, instead of saying "I was misleading/confusing/wrong in choosing that wording"? Here's a tip that's going to really help you in life, if you really follow it:…

None of those things come anywhere near driving while drunk or texting or talking on the phone. Stop making excuses you sick fuck.