You’re right, there are other unanswered questions besides where he came from.
You’re right, there are other unanswered questions besides where he came from.
I brought up the Audrey-trapped-in-the-Roadhouse-booth idea here last week, but it seems pretty unlikely now.
As Dented points out, it’s firmly established in the comic that The Tick is an escapee from an asylum. Not a mystery.
I agree with Sonnenfeld - Warburton was created to play the Tick. I checked out the new one - it’s a pale imitation to me.
And Audrey being there would tie in to the ringing, but it wouldn’t explain why she’s so worked up about Tina and Billy. None of these ideas explains everything.
At least now the people who complained about the all-women screening can see it.
I feel almost guilty actually commenting on the article, but here goes:
I had two more thoughts about this episode today. I think the eyeless woman (Naido) is very likely to be Judy, since Jefferies said Cooper has met her, which good Cooper did.
No, I'd bet anything that Judy is the eyeless woman. Jefferies says Cooper met her before, which the other Cooper did.
Pro football certainly wouldn't.
Then you should *love* the books or the radio show; they removed nearly all the jokes for the movie.
In other news, the John Whedon fan site is still going strong after 75 years. I've lost the link, though.
He has been. I think there's nothing more to it than he likes the scenes being presented in this order, but we'll see.
"Dad, can I borrow the car?"
"You talkin' to me? I don't see anyone else here, so you must be talkin' to me."
"Do we have to do this every time?"
If Sarah Palmer can take off her face now, does that mean Laura Palmer was able to take off her face when she was in Twin Peaks as well as in the Red Room? Seems extra-creepy to think about it.
I've met one who's all those things and also a deadbeat dad.
From the article:
"The blacklists are based on personal experiences of others' behavior, including views expressed on politics, social justice issues, and Google's diversity efforts."
As a former officer of a statewide GLBT caucus, I can attest to the good use the internet can be put to. I still think it's done more harm than good.
I'd be interested to see evidence of that. It sounds like the sort of thing that gets invented on right-wing forums.
Is that what the forum was for?