>there was his award-baiting role as a crack-addled teacher in Half Nelson

Homer is the definition of jerkass in the movie though, that pig shits everywhere, so he dumps waste in the Springflied lake, ignoring a million warning signs, which leads to an ecological disaster. Then they run away to Alaska because he says to Marge something like "in every marriage you have to blindly trust a…

Wow, that "why is she running in slow motion" joke is later seasons of Family Guy-levels bad. So fucking obvious.

I highly doubt she'll kill people, they're probably going to go Izombie/Warm Bodies route and she's gonna eat corpses.

I wish she was actually a cannibal, that seems way more interesting than yet another zombie show.

I have no interest in it, but it's getting decent-to-good reviews. I think Blumhouse is smartly trying to ressurect Shyamalan's career in small steps, giving him tiny budgets and putting his films against zero competition, that way he's basically rebuilding his resume from scratch.

He's great in it, i'm actually surprised he's pretty much left out out of Oscar talk, because he gives easily the best performance of that movie. He's so fucking creepy and unnerving.

Findlay has one of the most recognizeable faces on tv i think, she's Rosie Larsen from The Killing, and this http://welcometotwinpeaks.c… famous(infamous?) poster was everywhere for the first 2 seasons.

So, it's a series or a movie? Because there's no mention of what it is except for "the series would star Hahn" except she's already a lead in Amazon's new show that got picked up.

Eh, i remember critics saw it at upfronts and major consensus was that it's okay. I can see how that premise can work and i think some trailers/teasers looked good, but it could be because they don't have any dialogue in them, every time they actually show people talking my excitement drops significantly.

Late April premiere date is basically a death sentence, i wouldn't be surprised if they'll burn it two episodes at a time as well. It is weird considering who's behind the show and NBC's recent promise to give their "smart" comedies a chance.

People were suggesting that he's making films so fast now because he's getting old and afraid he won't be able to edit them. It definitely affected the quality, i love Malick, but hated his last two films, they're basically a self-parody. I don't have much hope for this one, so if it's good, it will be a nice surprise.

Affleck seems to be really afraid to turn into a laughing stock again, that was like his whole Oscar speech, don't lose hope, etc. And with everyone shitting on BvS to the point of his review reaction becoming a meme, Live By Night bombing with audiences and critics i think he's starting to panic now. He either…

Fucking hell, poor Billie.

Same, i thought besides tense airport sequence there was absolutely nothing interesting in the movie, but of course it won Best Picture because it features a scene were 2 old Hollywood guys save the day at the end.

James Franco, late January release and straight to streaming? We have a new classic on our hands here!

lol this comment reminds me of highly upvoted comment in one of the Community reviews that claimed 20 million people watch it on Yahoo, we all know how it ended.

The movie has been in development hell forever and i've seen people talk about the twist when Pratt and Lawrence were just in talks.

Why in the hell did they decide to keep the twist, even though script leaked ages ago and reaction to it was extremely negative? The fact that they kept it is actually a bigger twist in itself, because everyone was sure nobody's gonna keep such idiotic plot point in the movie.

Yeah, i know it's extremely unprofessional, but it'd be great to see one of these disasterous interviews end with reporter going on offense. I guess if you ignore Lewis, you're showing the whole world what a dick he is, but it's not like a 90-year old cares about public opinion, while in person you can actually hurt…