Taken in a vacuum, I don’t have a problem with it.

You wouldn’t side eye the fuck out of some neighborhood lady who did this, after her husband had the ambulance in your neighborhood after a 3-day crack and hooker binge.

Now we find out he made three separate transfers to his mom, each worth 10% of his annual salary. Shadier and shadier

Wanna bet the family peddles that narrative to the baby??

Maybe they should have said something when he said he supports beheadings.

Let’s see:

So she lived there, upstairs, had no clue they were making bombs or had AK 47s, were told by the couple that they support ISIS, but they have “nothing to do with this.” It just gets more and more fishy.

The fact that he told his father he supports ISIS AND THE FATHER DID NOTHING TO STOP THIS MURDER isn’t exactly “not involved in any way.”

I don’t disagree with you. But that’s legal logic for you. There was a serious legal question in my state (FL) whether a crossbow was a “firearm” for the purposes of possession by a felon.

The ability to travel is not restricted. Just the ability to travel by commercial airliners. You can still drive, fly private jets, walk across America, etc

Felons are constitutionally allowed to be stripped of their rights via the 14th amendment. People adjudicated mentally deficient are also presumed to have a ward to make decisions for them (i.e. The definition in and of itself is that they can't tend to their own affairs)

If the government were in any way competent, they would flag those people anyway when they go through the mandatory federal instant background check required for all firearms purchases. It seems to me like they would want to flag and watch instead of prohibit outright. It’s clearly a giant red flag to have someone on…

You don’t see a problem with a secret list that’s so flawed that sitting US Senators were on it and with all their power couldn’t fix the problem? Seriously?

Ted Kennedy was on the no fly list. It's clearly flawed.

Ted Kennedy was on the no fly list and famously couldn't get off.

It’s about control. They will want to be able to check your house at any time. What isn’t mutually exclusive to me is gun control and the police issues we’ve been having. Implicit in Gun control is a trust and fidelity to the police. You can’t think police are jackbooted thugs who shoot/murder people in the street in…

I'll take Krispy Kreme

I don’t understand that we have a thread here full of people calling to ban guns. Then on the other hand a thread about cops being untrustworthy. You can’t have it both ways. The banning of guns goes hand in hand with trust in the police. Personally, I trust the police less than I worry bout getting shot.

The voting black community is still very strong anti-drug. The same with the Hispanic community. Culturally, those communities tend to associate marijuana with hard drugs, and oppose efforts to liberalize drug laws and reduce sentences. In a generation, they will soften. I was working the polls handing out the local…

I agree with you, but it’s also why I support the second amendment. Because the far left position requires actual trust in the police. It always amazes me that seemingly rational liberals all of a sudden trust the police when it comes to a gunman. If police will gun down a black person in cold blood, then why would…