Gawkmodo, where speech is free as long as it fits the approved narrative.

Gizmodo: Where you can be as racist as you want as long as it’s against white males...

Portal axles are great for extra ground clearance but add f*ck ton of weight and cost while robbing horse power. Just remember that every solution has its problems.

And men shouldn’t have to wear uncomfortable, stuffy, constraining suits and tuxes. But it looks good, so we do it for important occasions or to earn money.

The same reason people don’t all drive around in Subaru Outbacks (yet).

When my wife wants to look her best, she’ll wear high heels and looks fantastic. When I want to look my best, I wear a suit and also look fantastic. Both are uncomfortable and both are only for a few hours. Fair deal for both of us, but in Kristen’s world, it’s all about the woman’s suffering and what a lech I am for…

I’m going to go with woman are their own worst enemy on this one. Undeniably women look great in heels, but the market for them is completely driven by women, not men requiring women to wear them. I have all-female company clients and despite getting to choose their own dress code, they wear heels. Albeit heels to the…

I’m tempted to say that a significant number of the women who wear these shoes do so because they like them, or at least feel that the benefits outweigh the detractions. I suspect most guys do not even notice the shoes women are wearing, ever. I sure don’t.

Eh, I don’t think it’s that cut and dry. If a woman talks to a bartender about drink options even though she knows what drinks she wants already, that’s not necessarily harassment. Might piss me off if I’m thirsty and waiting for my beer, though. But that’s that grey area of that particular job.

Because heels make your legs look fantastic. Being in heels really makes your calves stand out and also forces you to adopt a good posture in order to maintain balance.

Wanting a woman’s attention isn’t automatically creepy.

This will be cross posted to Jezebel so man bashing is expected.

No, hell no. The real heroes of auto shows are the ladies who wear stiletto heels for hours on end and still have the grace to smile at you when you ask them a question when all you really want is their attention.

That is awesome.

How is asking your neighbor to repaint their house because you dislike its color any more unreasonable than asking a neighbor to move their legally-parked vehicle simply because you dislike its appearance?

OK, neighbor, I’ll move my trailer. But I don’t like the color you’ve painted your house, and your shingles are too dark. So you’re going to need to address those.

This guy chose to live in an area where he had the right to do whatever (legally) he wants with his property.

Of course the counter argument is that you are basically dictating how he should live his life based on your whims and desires, i.e. YOU’RE FREE TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT AS LONG AS YOU DON’T DO ANYTHING I DON’T LIKE.*

Is it really worse than: I bought the property next to this, so I get to decide what happens there?

Both are selfish. Only one is unreasonable.
I mean, seriously, why does the neighbor get their way? On what logical grounds is trying to control someone else’s stuff LESS selfish than saying, I get to control my own stuff?