If you're not actively blowing the sort of moron who uses "not all men" seriously then you are in fact attacking him. You must fluff up these dudes every second of every day.
If you're not actively blowing the sort of moron who uses "not all men" seriously then you are in fact attacking him. You must fluff up these dudes every second of every day.
Why is s/he comparing alleged murderers—— who committed a horrible crime———-with a girl who was the victim of one? You don't see a problem here?
Oh, it definity would me. Men just don't get the screwing that our MRA buddy here would like us o believe. He had to lie, remember? There's nothing remotely close to his claim in the statute at all. And if there's any "lucky bastard" shit going on, it's probably coming from other men.
No, it's not real. I looked it up. This person, too, registered only to tell their lie about statutory rape——-making it seem boys were victimized by the law itself.
I looked up the California statute and you're lying.
This is not the only place s/he has argued this, apparently registering to do just this. Comparing a crime victim to criminals is bad enough; using as an example a rape victim who was cruelly blamed is quite another. If they want to make some kind of moral argument about kids committing crimes they could do that…
Um, sweetie, do you realize that saying, "I am NOT victim-blaming," does not in fact, prove that you are, indeed, innocent of victim-blaming? Because it doesn't work that way————-oh, and as long as we're chatting, following it up with a dismissive phrase like "victim-blaming circle jerk" makes one doubt your…
Really? Do you realize this person is essentially that rape victims ought to be held accountable? Or at least that's the collateral damage of his ridiculous argument, which talks about "responsibility" and compares a rape VICTIM to MURDERERS. And they've been making this argument all over, which seems to…
A point? S/he is comparing a crime victim to criminals. Is s/he trying to say victims should be more responsible? Or what?
It's not that good a point when you realize this person is comparing the victim of a crime to the committers of a crime. They've also tried this before.
Isn't this the umpteenth time you've tried thi gambit? Because I've seen it before and it's disgusting.
It's odd, then, that you keep minimizing his comments and have spent most of your time raging against people who criticize this judge. Sometimes apologies are worthless. This turned out to be one of those times.
It doesn't get much more black and white than an adult man bashing a rape victim. What are you, his kid?
What she didn't point out was what REALLY got people pissed: his horrible victim-blaming statements. Oh, sure, he said some horrible stuff but.......he got burned at the stake. Yeah.
So.....you're minimizing all the hateful victim-blaming shit he said?
Look at his other comments. He's a troll or a loser.....oops, department of redundancy department.
Gee, looks like you really, really want an excuse there, dude.
If a male teacher yanked up a boy's shorts? Hell, I'd like to do it to adult guys. If I wanted to see your grimy grey undies, you'd know.
Er, people were pointing out just that. Where were you looking? One of the girls described what sounded like hallucinations.
Oh, diddums, after "being a creep isn't a crime," you can fuck off with trying to act all offended. You're a creep yourself.