Not a "large" proportion. For that matter, almost ALL.rapists are male. Now what?

So....having changed the subject, what do YOU do to prevent rape?

They're almost never tried——-against potential rapists, thanks to the taboo against men being blamed or restricted, but where they've BEEN tried, there's been a drop in rapes. Edmonton did a "Don't be that guy," campaign, which of course MRAs tried to turn around to blame victims. Scotland did another. It's almost…

Oh, and NICE ONE bringing out that golden oldie- "She just changed her mind later." That one's always so reliable.

Niiiiiiice victim-blaming and excuse-making for rapists! Congrats. I knew there's be at least ONE dude spouting the usual crap: "but what if they RAPED ONE ANOTHER OMG?" I like how you made every excuse under the sun for rapists but blamed "hook up culture" (like women thought up that one) and feminists for that.

Fucking kinja. I was going to say, "Of course rapists are going to blame it on booze. They'll blame it on anything they can, who gives a shit?"

Kanin didn't just have shitty methodolgy. He violated ethical standards. Nobody has ever been able to duplicate his findings, which ought to be the kiss of death right there. MRAs loooooove his work, though, which is why he's such a good bell weather.

"Having an entitlement to sex" makes it sound like some vague civil right, not an act that involves holding a woman down and raping her, or getting her drunk and raping her when she's unconscious, or threatening or tricking a woman into submitting.

"No means no" means an awful lot of guys think "she didn't say no" is okay. But seriously, they're predators. If your date is unconscious, what the fuck is wrong with you? I've never seen a guy claim he accidentally raped somebody who wasn't a big huge tool.
These guys operate under excuses and sexism. We need to stop…

All this and nobody says anything about observers? As Thomas at Yes Means Yes says, look for that guy who pushes boundaries, pushes booze on a victim who's already had a lot, ———-and then tries to get her alone. Those three things are pretty glaring in combination.

I hope everything goes okay!

CAn anybody get to groupthink? Because it fucking crashes my goddamned browser every fucking time after it hangs up for thirty seconds or so. Fucking kinja.

Diddums, I can SEE your past comments with the false rape crap and everything, so bugger right off. I shouldn't have wasted my time on you.

Yeah, right. The only people who try this tack are those who defend Woody Allen and defend Woody Allen's apologists, which is what Johansson is. I know it's a hard position to be in: defend some money-hungry starlet who's already dumped a charity for pay, or do the right thing and defend a victim and NOT attack her…

Hiddles aroused a lot if, er, speculation of his own in "Coriolanus" because the gown of humility was so sheer. I'm in faboe.

It's always guys indulging in their fantasies of revenge upon She Who Opens Her Own Door. Or whatever. Always. And it's always other dudes——-or special snowflake women, in a rush to assure dudes that they're not like That———who defend the dudes. In other words, the sort of woman who—-when a guy says, "You're not like…

Yup.

Dear gawd.....

Oh GAWD that picture!

Wow, REALLY? OMG I NEVER WOULD HAVE GUESSED.